CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Ameron International Corporation ("Ameron" or the "Company") is a multinational
manufacturer of highly-engineered products and materials for the chemical,
industrial, energy, transportation and infrastructure markets. Ameron
is a leading producer of water transmission lines; high-performance coatings
and finishes for the protection of metals and structures; fiberglass-composite
pipe for transporting oil, chemicals and corrosive fluids; and specialized
materials and products used in infrastructure projects. The Company operates
businesses in North America, South America, Europe, Australasia and Asia.
The Company has four reportable segments. The Performance Coatings & Finishes
Group manufactures and markets high-performance industrial and marine
coatings. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group manufactures and markets
filament-wound and molded composite fiberglass pipe, tubing, fittings
and well screens. The Water Transmission Group manufactures and supplies
concrete and steel pressure pipe, concrete non-pressure pipe, protective
linings for pipe, and fabricated steel products. The Infrastructure Products
Group manufactures and sells ready-mix concrete, sand and aggregates,
concrete pipe and culverts, and concrete and steel lighting and traffic
poles. The markets served by the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group
and the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group are worldwide in scope. The Water
Transmission Group serves primarily the western U.S. The Infrastructure
Products Group's quarry and ready-mix business operates exclusively in
Hawaii, and poles are sold throughout the U.S. Ameron also participates
in several joint-venture companies, directly in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia,
and indirectly in Kuwait and Egypt.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources and Results
of Operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets,liabilities,revenues and
expenses,and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
during the reporting periods. Management bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis
for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company's significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2004 Annual Report.
Management believes the following accounting policies affect the more
significant estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ameron International
Corporation and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.All material intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The functional currencies
for the Company's foreign operations are the applicable local currencies.
The translation from the applicable foreign currencies to U.S. dollars
is performed for balance sheet accounts using current exchange rates
in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts
using a weighted-average exchange rate during the period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income. The Company advances funds to certain foreign subsidiaries that
are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future. Translation
adjustments arising from these advances are also included in accumulated
other comprehensive income. The timing of repayments of intercompany
advances could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial
statements. Additionally, earnings of foreign subsidiaries are often
reinvested outside the U.S. Unforeseen repatriation of such earnings
could result in significant unrecognized U.S. tax liability. Gains or
losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in
other income.
Revenue for the Performance Coatings & Finishes, Fiberglass-Composite Pipe and
Infrastructure Products segments is recognized when risk of ownership
and title pass, primarily at the time goods are shipped, provided that
an agreement exists between the customer and the Company, the price
is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. In limited
circumstances within the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group, revenue
recognition associated with shipment of coatings for marine dry dockings
is delayed until product returns are processed. Revenue is recognized
for the Water Transmission Group primarily under the percentage-of-completion
method, typically based on completed units of production, since products
are manufactured under enforceable and binding construction contracts,
typically are designed for specific applications, are not interchangeable
between projects, and are not manufactured for stock. In some cases,
if products are manufactured for stock or are not related to specific
construction contracts, revenue is recognized under the same criteria
used by the other three segments. Revenue under the percentage-of-completion
method is subject to a greater level of estimation, which affects the
timing of revenue recognition, costs and profits. Estimates are reviewed
on a consistent basis and are adjusted periodically to reflect current
expectations.
The Company expenses environmental clean-up costs related to existing conditions
resulting from past or current operations on a site-by-site basis. Liabilities
and costs associated with these matters, as well as other pending litigation
and asserted claims arising in the ordinary course of business, require
estimates of future costs and judgments based on the knowledge and experience
of management and its legal counsel. When the Company's exposures can
be reasonably estimated and are probable, liabilities and expenses are
recorded. The ultimate resolution of any such exposure to the Company
may differ due to subsequent developments.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally
on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. Certain steel inventories
used by the Water Transmission Group are valued using the last-in, first-out
("LIFO") method. Significant changes in steel inventory levels or costs
could materially impact the Company's financial statements. Reserves
are established for excess, obsolete and rework inventories based on
age, estimates of salability and forecasted future demand. Management
records an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on historical
experience and expected trends. A significant reduction in demand or
a significant worsening of customer credit quality could materially
impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost and is depreciated
principally using a straight-line method based on the estimated useful
lives of the related assets, generally two to 40 years.
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures or affiliates ("joint
ventures") over which the Company has significant influence are accounted
for under the equity method of accounting, whereby the investment is
carried at the cost of acquisition, plus the Company's equity in undistributed
earnings or losses since acquisition. Investments in joint ventures
over which the Company does not have the ability to exert significant
influence over the investee's operating and financing activities are
accounted for under the cost method of accounting. The Company's investment
in TAMCO, a steel mini-mill in California, is accounted for under the
equity method. Investments in Ameron Saudi Arabia, Ltd., Bondstrand,
Ltd. and Oasis-Ameron, Ltd. are accounted for under the cost method
due to management's current assessment of the Company's influence over
these joint ventures.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such
assets may not be recoverable. If the estimated future, undiscounted
cash flows from the use of an asset are less than its carrying value,
a write-down is recorded to reduce the related assets to estimated fair
value. The Company also reviews intangible assets for impairment at
least annually, based on the estimated future, discounted cash flows
associated with such assets. Actual cash flows may differ significantly
from estimated cash flows. Additionally, current estimates of future
cash flows may differ from subsequent estimates of future cash flows.
Changes in estimated or actual cash flows could materially impact the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company is self insured for a portion of the losses and liabilities
primarily associated with workers' compensation claims and general,
product and vehicle liability. Losses are accrued based upon the Company's
estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical
experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance
industry. The estimate of self insurance liability includes an estimate
of incurred but not reported claims, based on data compiled from historical
experience. Actual experience could differ significantly from these
estimates and could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
The Company follows the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions," and
SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions," when accounting for pension and other postretirement
benefits. Under these accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding
the valuation of benefit obligations and, in certain cases, the performance
of plan assets that are controlled and invested by third-party fiduciaries.
Delayed recognition of differences between actual results and expected
or estimated results is a guiding principle of these standards. Such
delayed recognition provides a gradual recognition of benefit obligations
and investment performance over the working lives of the employees who
benefit under the plans, based on various assumptions. Assumed discount
rates are used to calculate the present value of benefit payments which
are projected to be made in the future, including projections of increases
in employees' annual compensation and health care costs. Management
also projects the future return on invested assets based principally
on prior performance and future expectations. These projected returns
reduce the net benefit costs the Company records in the current period.
Actual results could vary significantly from projected results, and
such deviation could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial
statements. Management consults with actuaries when determining these
assumptions. Unforecasted program changes, including termination, freezing
of benefits or acceleration of benefits, could result in an immediate
recognition of unrecognized benefit obligations; and such recognition
could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
During 2004, the Company changed the assumed discount rate and projected
rates of increase in compensation levels and health care costs. The
discount rate is based on market interest rates. At November 30, 2004,
the Company decreased the discount rate from 6.00% to 5.85% based on
the market interest rates on long-term, fixed-rate debt securities of
highly-rated corporations. In estimating the expected return on assets,
the Company considers past performance and future expectations for various
types of investments as well as the expected long-term allocation of
assets. At November 30, 2004, the Company maintained the expected long-term
rate of return on assets assumption at 8.75% to reflect the expectations
for future returns from investments in the equity markets. In projecting
the rate of increase in compensation levels, the Company considers movements
in inflation rates as reflected by market interest rates. At November
30, 2004, the Company decreased the assumed annual rate of compensation
increase from 3.50% to 3.35%. In selecting the rate of increase in health
care costs, the Company considers past performance and forecasts of
future health care cost trends. At November 30, 2004, the Company decreased
the rate of increase in health care costs from 10% to 9%, decreasing
ratably until reaching 5.00% in 2008 and beyond.
Different assumptions would impact the Company's projected benefit
obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs related to pensions
and the accrued other benefit obligations and benefit costs related
to postretirement benefits. The following reflects the impact associated
with a change in certain assumptions (in thousands):
| |
1% Increase |
1% Decrease |
| |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Discount Rate:
Pensions |
$(22,346) |
$ (2,344) |
$30,202 |
$ 3,040 |
Discount Rate:
Other postretirement benefits |
(332) |
(6) |
392 |
(2) |
| Expected rate of return on assets |
Not Applicable |
(1,454) |
Not Applicable |
1,454 |
| Rate of increase in compensation levels |
6,545 |
927 |
(5,637) |
(827) |
| Rate of increase in health care costs |
148 |
23 |
(129) |
(19) |
Additional information regarding pensions and other postretirement benefits is
disclosed in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
the Company's 2004 Annual Report.
Management incentive compensation is accrued based on current estimates of the
Company's ability to achieve short-term and long-term performance targets.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between
the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based
on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences
are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when
necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts expected
to be realized. Quarterly income taxes are estimated based on the mix
of income by jurisdiction forecasted for the full fiscal year. The Company
believes that it has adequately provided for tax-related matters. The
Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities in various jurisdictions.
Matters raised upon audit may involve substantial amounts and could
be material.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During 2004, the Company generated $10.1 million of cash from operating activities
compared to $43.2 million in the same period in 2003. The lower operating
cash flow in 2004 was primarily due to lower earnings, excluding gains
on asset sales and earnings from joint ventures in excess of distributions,
and reduced liabilities. Liabilities decreased primarily due to the
payment of benefits associated with the termination of two executive
benefit plans, described below. Receivables increased due to higher
sales and the timing of collections.
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $4.2 million in 2004, compared
to $13.9 million used in 2003. Net cash provided by investing activities
in 2004 consisted of proceeds from the sale of assets, including $15.3
million from the sale of property vacated as part of a plant consolidation
within the Water Transmission Group, and $7.2 million from the liquidation
of life insurance policies, offset by capital expenditures which were
primarily for normal replacement and upgrades of machinery and equipment
and for a new fiberglass pipe plant in Malaysia. In 2003, the Company
sold its minority interest in a Mexican coatings venture for $3.0 million.
During the fiscal year ending November 30, 2005, the Company anticipates
spending between approximately $25 and $35 million on capital expenditures,
including additional expenditures on the plant in Malaysia of approximately
$8 million. Capital expenditures are expected to be funded by existing
cash balances, cash generated from operations or additional borrowings.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $5.0 million in 2004, compared
to $19.8 million in 2003. The net cash used in 2004 consisted of the
net repayment of debt of $.8 million, debt issuance costs of $.5 million,
and payment of common stock dividends of $6.7 million, offset by a net
$3.0 million from the issuance of common stock related to the exercise
of stock options and treasury shares used to pay withholding taxes on
vested restricted shares.
In June 2004, the Company extended a $100.0 million revolving credit facility
with six banks (the "Revolver"). Under the Revolver,the Company may,
at its option, borrow at floating interest rates based on specified
margins over money market rates, at any time until June 2008, when all
borrowings under the Revolver must be repaid.
The Company's lending agreements contain various restrictive covenants, including
the requirement to maintain specified amounts of net worth and restrictions
on cash dividends, borrowings, liens, investments and guarantees. The
Company is required to maintain consolidated net worth of $181.4 million
plus 50% of net income and 75% of proceeds from any equity issued after
January 24, 2003. The Company's consolidated net worth exceeded the
covenant amount by $76.4 million as of November 30, 2004. The Company
is required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated
funded indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization ("EBITDA") of no more than 2.75 times. As of November
30, 2004, the Company maintained a consolidated leverage ratio of 2.1
times EBITDA. Lending agreements require that the Company maintain qualified
consolidated tangible assets at least equal to the outstanding secured
funded indebtedness. As of November 30, 2004 qualifying tangible assets
equaled 1.9 times funded indebtedness. Under the most restrictive fixed
charge coverage ratio, the sum of EBITDA and rental expense less cash
taxes must be at least 1.5 times the sum of interest expense, rental
expense, dividends and scheduled funded debt payments. As of November
30, 2004, the Company maintained such a fixed charge coverage ratio
of 1.8 times.
Cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2004 totaled $30.1 million, an increase
of $9.7 million from November 30, 2003. At November 30, 2004 the Company
had total debt outstanding of $93.7 million and approximately $104 million
in unused committed and uncommitted credit lines available from foreign
and domestic banks. The Company's highest borrowing and the average
borrowing levels during 2004 were $108.3 million and $96.3 million,
respectively.
In June 2004, the Company terminated two executive benefit programs in consideration
of ongoing costs, anticipated legislative restrictions on such programs,
and a preference for executive benefit plans having more predictable
costs. Ameron had previously purchased life insurance policies which
had been set aside to pay benefits under these plans. At the time of
termination of the plans, the cash surrender value of such life insurance
policies totaled approximately $26.9 million and exceeded the amount
that was required if immediate lump-sum payments were elected by all
participants, which totaled $25.6 million. Following termination of
the plans, $24.7 million was paid to participants to settle most of
the obligations of the Company under the plans, initially using existing
cash balances and then the cash surrender value of a portion of the
life insurance policies. Management anticipates that the remaining portion
of the life insurance policies with a cash surrender value of $20.0
million as of November 30, 2004 will continue to be held for general
investment purposes and to defer income taxes.
Management believes that cash flows from operations and current cash balances,
together with currently available lines of credit will be sufficient
to meet operating requirements in 2005. Cash available from operations
could be affected by any general economic downturn or any downturn or
any decline or adverse changes in the Company's business, such as loss
of customers or significant raw material price increases. Management
believes it is unlikely that business or economic conditions will worsen
or that operating costs will increase sufficiently to impact short-term
liquidity.
The Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments at November
30, 2004 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period |
| Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Long-Term Debt (a) |
$ 93,682 |
$ 18,333 |
$ 28,334 |
$ 31,315 |
$ 15,700 |
| Operating Leases |
40,203 |
4,590 |
7,262 |
6,549 |
21,802 |
| Total Contractual Obligations (b) |
$133,885 |
$ 22,923 |
$ 35,596 |
$ 37,864 |
$ 37,502 |
| |
| Commitments Expiring Per Period |
| Commercial Commitments |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Standby Letters of Credit (c) |
$ 2,307 |
$ 2,307 |
— |
— |
— |
| Total Commercial Commitments (b) |
$ 2,307 |
$ 2,307 |
— |
— |
— |
(a) Included in long-term debt is $915 outstanding under a revolving
credit facility which is supported by the Revolver.
(b) The Company has no capitalized lease obligations, unconditional
purchase obligations, or standby repurchase obligations.
(c) Not included are standby letters of credit totaling $16,065 supporting
industrial development bonds with a principal of $15,700. The principal
amount of the industrial development bonds is included in long-term
debt. The standby letters of credit are issued under the Revolver.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2004 COMPARED WITH 2003
General
Net income totaled $13.5 million, or $1.59 per diluted share, on sales of $605.9
million for the year ended November 30, 2004, compared to net income
of $29.9 million, or $3.67 per diluted share, on sales of $600.5 million
for the same period in 2003. All operating segments had higher sales
except the Water Transmission Group. Sales of the Water Transmission
Group declined in 2004 because of labor disputes that resulted in strikes
at two of its plants and weak demand in its primary market, the western
U.S. Net income was lower in 2004 as lower gross profits, higher selling,
general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") and the curtailment and
settlement costs associated with the termination of the benefit plans
were partially offset by higher other income, lower taxes and higher
equity in the earnings of TAMCO. Excluding income from joint ventures,
the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group had higher segment income, while
the Performance Coatings & Finishes, Water Transmission and Infrastructure
Products Groups had lower segment income.
Sales
Sales increased $5.4 million in 2004, compared to 2003. Sales increased due to
the impact of changing foreign exchange rates on the Company's foreign
coatings and fiberglass pipe operations and higher demand for poles,
partially offset by reduced demand in markets served by the Water Transmission
Group.
Performance Coatings & Finishes' sales increased $9.3 million in 2004 due to
the appreciation of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Sales in local currencies by operations outside the U.S. increased,
while sales in the U.S. were lower. Improvements came from sales of
fire protection coatings in Europe and coil coatings in New Zealand.
Sales of protective coatings in the U.S. and Europe declined as a result
of continued weakness in spending in the heavy-industrial and chemical
markets. Additionally, sales of coatings for use in offshore oil and
gas exploration and production weakened in 2004 as offshore construction
slowed in the U.S. The anticipated upturn in spending by industrial
customers in the U.S. and Europe remained slower than expected in 2004,
and markets served by the Performance Coating & Finishes Group are not
forecasted to improve in the near term.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $1.7 million in 2004 due primarily
to the impact of favorable foreign exchange rates and partly to the
strength of Asian operations. Asian operations, which serve the marine
construction markets located in Korea, China and Japan, benefited from
the strong worldwide demand for oil tankers and offshore production
vessels. New marine construction in Asia increased due to high oil prices
and regulations requiring double-hull tankers. The industrial markets
in the U.S. and Europe remained slow due to general economic conditions
and a shift of new facilities to Asia and other developing markets.
Sales in the U.S. were down due to the weak industrial market and lower
activity in the U.S. offshore construction market. Sales of oilfield
tubing for onshore applications were flat as spending was concentrated
on larger offshore projects constructed in Asia. Overall, expected demand
for fiberglass piping remains robust, driven by higher oil prices and
the increased cost of substitute products, especially steel piping.
The Water Transmission Group's sales decreased $11.3 million in 2004 due to weak
market conditions and labor disputes at two of the Group's principal
plants in Southern California in the first half of 2004. Workers at
the two plants struck in early February. Agreement was reached at one
of the plants in the first quarter, at the end of February, and the
second plant in the second quarter, at the end of March. Sales of protective-lining
products for sewer pipe also declined due to a cyclical slowdown in
the waste water market and increased competition from alternative products
and suppliers. Revenue is recognized in the Water Transmission Group
primarily under the percentage-of-completion method and is subject to
a certain level of estimation, which affects the timing of revenue recognition,
costs and profits. Estimates are reviewed on a consistent basis and
are adjusted when actual results are expected to significantly differ
from those estimates. Water Transmission's year-end backlog was significantly
higher than at the end of 2003 as a series of large projects were successfully
bid; however, the market for concrete and steel pressure pipe remains
soft in the western U.S., affected by a cyclical lull in infrastructure
spending and government budgetary constraints. The backlog bodes well
for 2005, and the expected long-term outlook for the Water Transmission
Group remains positive based on the needs for water infrastructure in
the western U.S.
Infrastructure Products' sales increased $5.8 million in 2004 due to strong housing
and commercial construction spending, which was spurred by low interest
rates. Ameron's Hawaiian operations recovered from a labor dispute at
the Company's principal aggregates and ready-mix concrete operations
on Oahu in Hawaii which began in February and ended in early April.
Construction spending in Hawaii was deferred during the strikes, and
demand for aggregates, ready-mix concrete and concrete pipe used for
public infrastructure, housing and military construction remains strong.
Ameron's pole business had higher sales of concrete poles used in street
lighting, primarily associated with housing starts. Sales of steel traffic
poles also increased. The forecast for the Infrastructure Products Group
remains positive due to expectations of continued spending on residential,
commercial, government and military construction.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2004 was $148.4 million, or 24.5% of sales, compared to gross
profit of $166.5 million, or 27.7% of sales, in 2003. Gross profit decreased
$18.1 million due to lower margins, the impact in the first half of
the strikes on plant utilization and a net $7.3 million expense related
to an increase in LIFO reserves caused by higher steel prices.
In 2004, gross profit of the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group was flat compared
to gross profit in 2003. Higher profit of $2.8 million from increased
sales was offset by a similar reduction in gross profit due to lower
margins. Profit margins were adversely impacted by higher manufacturing
costs of $1.8 million in the U.S. and Europe, due to inefficient plant
utilization, and higher raw material costs of $.7 million. The Group
was unable to increase prices sufficiently to cover additional costs
due to competitive pressures, especially in dollar-based markets in
the Middle East and the former Soviet Union served by the Company's
European operations.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $2.4 million in
2004 due to higher sales and improved margins. Higher sales generated
$.6 million higher gross profit, while improved margins contributed
$1.8 million. The margin increase resulted from the mix of products
sold in 2004, especially from Asian operations which benefited from
the strength of local markets, and improved conditions in worldwide
oilfield markets.
Gross profit of the Water Transmission Group decreased $11.1 million in 2004.
Gross profit decreased $2.7 million because of lower sales and $8.4
million due to lower margins. Profit margins were lower due to competitive
pressures brought on by slow market conditions and increased workers'
compensation costs of $1.2 million. Margins in 2004 and 2003 were adversely
affected by the San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge project, for which
the Water Transmission Group provided lower-margin steel pilings. Deliveries
to the San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge project were completed in 2004.
The Infrastructure Products Group's gross profit declined slightly as profit
on higher sales was offset by slightly lower margins. Margins declined
due to wet weather and the labor dispute in Hawaii in the first half
of 2004, reducing profits $1.6 million. Higher concrete poles sales
generated increased gross profit of approximately $1.3 million.
Additionally, consolidated gross profit was $7.8 million lower in 2004 compared
to the same period in 2003 due primarily to increased reserves associated
with LIFO accounting of certain steel inventories used by the Water
Transmission Group. The LIFO method is used to defer income taxes on
operating profit of the Water Transmission Group. Income taxes and the
LIFO reserves are not allocated to the operating segments. Gross profit
was also $1.3 million lower as a result of other inventory adjustments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")
SG&A totaled $137.5 million, or 22.7% of sales, in 2004, compared to $127.4 million,
or 21.2%, in 2003. SG&A increased $10.1 million due to higher costs
of third-party insurance coverage of $2.2 million, higher legal and
consulting expenses of $3.4 million and Sarbanes-Oxley 404 auditing
and implementation costs of $3.5 million, offset by lower compensation
expenses of $1.9 million. The appreciation of foreign currencies increased
SG&A of foreign operations by approximately $3.9 million. Additionally
in 2003, SG&A included a legal expense recovery of $1.0 million, representing
amounts agreed to be reimbursed to the Company by its own and a supplier's
insurance companies for past legal fees and costs in excess of the negotiated
settlement of the Central Arizona Project lawsuit.
Pension Plan Curtailment/Settlement
In June 2004, the Company terminated two executive benefit plans in consideration
of ongoing costs, anticipated legislative restrictions on such programs,
and a preference for executive benefit plans having more predictable
costs. The Company incurred a pretax expense of $12.8 million due to
the termination of the plans and distributions to plan participants.
The Company recorded this expense in accordance with SFAS No. 88,"Employers'
Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension
Plans and for Termination Benefits."SFAS No. 88 requires settlement
accounting if the cost of all settlements, including lump-sum retirement
benefits paid, in a year exceeds,or is expected to exceed, the total
of the service and interest cost components of pension expense for the
same period.
Termination and settlement of the plans is expected to reduce benefit expenses
in future years. In addition to the termination and settlement costs,
Ameron expensed $1.8 million under the plans in 2004 and $2.1 million
in 2003.
Other Income
Other income increased to $17.9 million in 2004 from $10.9 million in 2003. Other
income included royalties and fees from licensees, foreign currency
transaction gains and losses, and other miscellaneous income. Included
in 2004 was a gain of $13.1 million on the sale of excess property vacated
as part of a program to streamline pipe manufacturing operations within
the Water Transmission Group. Included in 2003 was a gain of $2.5 million
on the sale of Ameron's minority interest in a Mexican coatings venture.
Income from investments accounted for under the cost method decreased
from $6.3 million in 2003 to $.5 million in 2004 due to the timing of
dividend payments. The fiberglass pipe and coatings ventures continued
to perform well due to the strength of oilfield and infrastructure markets
in Saudi Arabia. The concrete pipe venture experienced a cyclical lull
and increased competition from alternative products. Dividends from
Ameron's Saudi Arabian ventures are expected to increase in 2005.
Interest
Interest expense totaled $5.3 million in 2004, compared to $6.6 million in 2003.
The decrease reflected lower average borrowing levels in combination
with lower average effective interest rates related to the repayment
of fixed-rate debt with a higher interest rate and increased utilization
of floating rate debt.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes declined to $8.0 million compared to $14.0 million in 2003. The
effective tax rate increased from 32% in 2003 to 75% in 2004. The effective
tax rate was significantly higher in 2004 due to IRS limitations on
the deductibility of a portion of the settlements associated with the
executive benefit plan terminations. Approximately $18.5 million of
the $24.7 million paid to participants of the terminated plans is not
expected to receive an associated tax benefit. Excluding the impact
of the termination of the benefit plans, the effective rate in 2004
would have been less than in 2003 due to lower levels of earnings from
domestic operations. Income from certain foreign operations is taxed
at rates that are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity income, which consists of Ameron's share of the results of TAMCO, increased
from $.6 million in 2003 to $10.8 million in 2004. Ameron owns 50% of
TAMCO, a mini-mill that produces steel rebar for the construction industry
in the western U.S. TAMCO performed well throughout 2004 due to increased
demand for steel rebar and higher selling prices. The worldwide market
for steel products increased dramatically in 2004 because of demand
for steel in China. Demand declined at the end of the fourth quarter
as TAMCO's customers adjusted inventory levels to reflect confidence
in continued supply of product. The recent decline could be a signal
of softening in 2005 from the record level of 2004. Nevertheless, the
outlook for TAMCO remains strong. Equity income is shown net of income
taxes. Dividends from TAMCO are taxed at an effective rate of 9.3%,
reflecting the dividend exclusion provided to the Company under current
tax laws.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2003 COMPARED WITH 2002
General
Net income totaled $29.9 million, or $3.67 per diluted share, on sales of $600.5
million for the year ended November 30, 2003, compared to net income
of $28.1 million, or $3.49 per diluted share, on sales of $539.5 million
for the same period in 2002. All operating segments had higher sales.
The Performance Coatings & Finishes and Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Groups
had higher segment income, while the Water Transmission and Infrastructure
Products Groups had lower segment income. The increase in net income
came from higher sales and higher gross profit, offset by higher selling,
general and administrative expenses and lower equity in earnings of
TAMCO.
Sales
Sales increased by $61.0 million in 2003. While all operating segments improved,
the largest gains came from the Company's Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
and the Water Transmission businesses. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
Group benefited from strong demand in Asia for fiberglass piping for
construction of offshore oil and marine vessels, and the Water Transmission
Group's increase came from the fabrication of steel pilings for the
San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge.
Performance Coatings & Finishes' sales increased $7.0 million due
to the appreciation of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
Sales in local currencies by operations outside the U.S. were relatively
flat, while sales in the U.S. were lower. Sales of protective coatings
in the U.S. declined due to continued sluggishness in U.S. chemical,
industrial and marine markets caused by general economic conditions.
The industrial markets in Europe were similarly sluggish. However, the
international demand for offshore and marine coatings improved in 2003.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $26.2 million due primarily
to the strength of Asian operations and partly to the impact of favorable
foreign exchange rates. Asian operations benefited from the strong worldwide
demand for oil tankers and offshore production vessels driven by high
oil prices. The industrial markets in the U.S. and Europe remained depressed
due to general economic conditions. Sales of onshore oilfield piping
improved during 2003 as oil prices remained at a relatively high level
and oilfield spending increased.
The Water Transmission Group's sales increased in 2003 by $20.5 million
due to sales of steel pilings for the San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge.
Sales of concrete and steel pipe for fresh and waste water applications
declined during the year due to a cyclical slowdown in the water market
in the western U.S. Water Transmission's year-end backlog was lower
than at the end of 2002, reflecting the lull in water projects in the
western U.S.
Infrastructure Products' sales increased $6.9 million due to strong
housing and commercial construction spending, which was spurred by low
interest rates. Ameron's Hawaiian operations benefited from improved
demand for ready-mix concrete and concrete pipe used for public infrastructure,
housing and military construction. Ameron's pole business had higher
sales of concrete poles used in street lighting, primarily associated
with housing starts. Sales of steel traffic poles declined due to the
lack of steel tubes.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2003 was $166.5 million, or 27.7% of sales, compared to gross
profit of $141.9 million, or 26.3% of sales, in 2002. Gross profit increased
$24.6 million due to higher sales and improved margins. Overall margins
improved primarily due to a change in product mix as the proportion
of higher-margin fiberglass-pipe sales increased.
Gross profit of the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group increased $2.8 million,
with $2.0 million from higher profit on increased sales and $.8 million
from higher margins. Margins improved due to better inventory management
in 2003, with lower reserves needed for obsolete and slow-moving inventory.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $14.3 million in
2003. The increase was based almost equally on higher sales and higher
margins. Gross profit margins improved due to lower raw material costs
of $2.0 million, and improved plant efficiencies of $5.2 million. Plant
efficiencies improved due to more balanced use of capacity and cost
containment programs initiated in 2002.
Gross profit of the Water Transmission Group increased $4.2 million due to higher
sales. However, profit margins decreased, offsetting the increase in
gross profit by approximately $1.0 million. Margins were impacted by
a change in product mix in 2003 due to the higher level of lower-margin
steel pilings. The supply of steel pilings for the San Francisco/Oakland
Bay Bridge was roughly 50% completed at the end of 2003.
The Infrastructure Products Group's gross profit increased $1.1 million, on slightly
lower margins, due to higher sales. Margins declined as the mix of concrete
pole sales included a higher proportion of lower-margin, smaller poles.
Additionally, gross profit was $2.1 million higher in 2003 due primarily to the
establishment in 2002 of reserves associated with LIFO accounting of
certain steel inventories and certain slow-moving fiberglass-pipe inventories
which did not repeat in 2003.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses totaled $127.4 million, or 21.2% of sales, in 2003, compared to
$105.9 million, or 19.6%, in 2002. SG&A increased $21.5 million due
to higher pension costs of $9.6 million and higher costs for third-party
insurance coverage of $2.9 million. Additionally, SG&A in 2003 included
higher new product development and marketing costs of $3.5 million,
higher employee benefit costs of $2.8 million, higher legal fees of
$1.4 million and higher marketing costs associated with higher sales
of $.7 million. The appreciation of foreign currencies increased SG&A
of the Company's foreign operations by about $4.7 million in 2003; however,
the increase was more than offset by the estimated impact of cost reduction
programs initiated in 2002. Legal fees were higher due to asbestos and
silica claims and due to lower recovery related to the Central Arizona
Project lawsuits. In 2003, $1.0 million was recovered representing amounts
agreed to be reimbursed to the Company by its own and a supplier's insurance
companies for past legal fees and costs in excess of the negotiated
settlement of the Central Arizona Project lawsuits reached in January
2003. The resolution of the lawsuit enabled the reversal in 2002 of
reserves totaling $1.7 million.
Other Income
Other income increased to $10.9 million in 2003 from $9.8 million in 2002. Other
income included earnings from investments accounted for under the cost
method, royalties and fees from licensees, foreign currency transaction
gains and losses, and other miscellaneous income. Included in 2003 was
a gain of $2.5 million on the sale of Ameron's minority interest in
a Mexican coatings venture. Income from investments accounted for under
the cost method increased from $5.9 million in 2002 to $6.3 million
in 2003. The increase was due primarily to higher dividends received
from Ameron's fiberglass-pipe joint venture in Saudi Arabia.
Interest
Interest expense totaled $6.6 million in 2003, compared to $6.8 million in 2002.
The decrease reflected lower average borrowing levels in 2003 offset
by the higher interest on the fixed-rate notes placed early in 2003.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes in 2003 was $14.0 million, a decrease of $.2 million
from 2002. The effective tax rate decreased to 32% in 2003 from 36%
in 2002. The effective tax rate was lower due to the increase of foreign
profits, especially from Asia, and lower foreign income tax rates.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity in earnings of joint venture decreased to $.6 million in 2003 from $3.3
million in 2002. Equity income declined due to TAMCO. Ameron's equity
in TAMCO's earnings decreased as TAMCO suffered throughout 2003 from
higher energy and scrap costs. Energy costs reflected the lingering
impact of California's electricity crisis. Scrap costs rose due to demand
for Asian consumption.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing, other than listed
in the Liquidity and Capital Resources Section herein. All of the Company's
subsidiaries are included in the financial statements, and the Company
does not have relationships with any special purpose entities.
MARKET RISKS
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company operates internationally, giving rise to exposure to market risks
from changes in foreign exchange rates. From time to time, the Company
borrows in various currencies to reduce the level of net assets subject
to changes in foreign exchange rates or purchases foreign exchange forward
and option contracts to hedge firm commitments, such as receivables
and payables, denominated in foreign currencies. The Company does not
use the contracts for speculative or trading purposes. At November 30,
2004, the Company had 25 foreign currency forward contracts expiring
at various dates through May 2005, with an aggregate face value and
fair value of $9.8 million and $10.2 million, respectively. Such instruments
are carried at fair value, with related adjustments recorded in other
income.
Debt Risk
The
Company has variable-rate, short-term and long-term debt as well as
fixed-rate, long-term debt. The fair value of the Company's fixed-rate
debt is subject to changes in interest rates. The estimated fair value
of the Company's variable-rate debt approximates the carrying value
of such debt since the variable interest rates are market-based, and
the Company believes such debt could be refinanced on materially similar
terms. The Company is subject to the availability of credit to support
new requirements, to refinance amortizing long-term debt and to refinance
short-term debt.
As of November 30, 2004, the estimated fair value of notes payable by the Company
totaling $16.7 million, with a fixed rate of 7.92%, was $17.8 million.
The Company is required to repay these notes in installments of $8.3
million in 2005 and $8.4 million in 2006. As ofNovember 30, 2004, the
estimated fair value of notes payable by the Company totaling $50.0
million, with a fixed rate of 5.36%, was $51.8 million. The Company
is required to repay these notes in annual installments of $10.0 million
from 2005 to 2009, inclusive. The Company had $7.2 million of variable-rate
industrial development bonds payable at a rate of 1.86% as of November
30, 2004, payable in 2016. The Company also had $8.5 million of variable-rate
industrial development bonds payable at a rate of 1.86% as of November
30, 2004, payable in 2021. As of November 30, 2004, the Company borrowed
$10.4 million under the Revolver, which permits borrowings up to $100.0
million through June 2008. The average interest rate of such borrowings
was 4.16% as of November 30, 2004. The Company also borrowed $.9 million
under various foreign short-term bank facilities, that are supported
by the Revolver. The average interest rate of such borrowings was 9.31%
as of November 30, 2004.
CONTINGENCIES
The Company is one of numerous defendants in various asbestos-related personal
injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for
asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously
manufactured by the Company and others, and, at this time, the Company
is generally not aware of the extent of injuries allegedly suffered
by the individuals or the facts supporting the claim that injuries were
caused by the Company's products. Based upon the information available
to it at this time, the Company is not in a position to evaluate its
potential exposure, if any, as a result of such claims. Hence, no amounts
have been accrued for loss contingencies related to these lawsuits in
accordance with SFAS No. 5,"Accounting for Contingencies." The Company
continues to vigorously defend all such lawsuits. As of November 30,
2004, the Company was a defendant in asbestos-related cases involving
18,298 claimants, compared to 17,447 claimants as of November 30, 2003.
The Company is not in a position to estimate the number of additional
claims that may be filed against it in the future. For the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2004, there were new claims involving 1,633 claimants,
dismissals and/or settlements involving 782 claimants and no judgments.
Net costs and expenses incurred by the Company for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2004 in connection with asbestos-related claims were approximately
$.5 million.
The Company is one of numerous defendants in various silica-related personal
injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for
silica-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously
manufactured by the Company and others, and, at this time, the Company
is not aware of the extent of injuries allegedly suffered by the individuals
or the facts supporting the claim that injuries were caused by the Company's
products. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the
Company is not in a position to evaluate its potential exposure, if
any, as a result of such claims. Hence, no amounts have been accrued
for loss contingencies related to these lawsuits in accordance with
SFAS No. 5. The Company continues to vigorously defend all such lawsuits.
As of November 30, 2004, the Company was a defendant in silica-related
cases involving 8,226 claimants, compared to 6,847 claimants as of November
30, 2003. The Company is not in a position to estimate the number of
additional claims that may be filed against it in the future. For the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, there were new claims involving
1,966 claimants, dismissals and/or settlements involving 587 claimants
and no judgments. Net costs and expenses incurred by the Company for
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 in connection with silica-related
claims were approximately $.4 million.
In April 2003, the Company was served with a complaint in an action brought by
J. Ray McDermott, Inc., J. Ray McDermott, S.A. and SparTEC, Inc. (collectively
"McDermott") in the District Court of Harris County, Texas against the
Company and two co-defendants, in connection with certain coatings supplied
by the defendants in 2002 for an offshore production facility known
as a SPAR being constructed by McDermott for Dominion Exploration and
Production, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (collectively
"Dominion"). McDermott alleges that the Company's co-defendants improperly
supplied coatings which contained lead and/or lead chromate, and that
as a result the Company and its co-defendants are liable to McDermott
for all costs associated with removal and replacement of those coatings.
McDermott's petition as filed alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified
amount; however, McDermott's economic expert subsequently estimated
McDermott's damages at approximately $21 million, a figure which the
Company contests. Trial of this matter is expected in August 2005. The
Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to this action. Based
upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not
in a position to evaluate the ultimate outcome of this matter.
Separately, in May 2003, Dominion brought an action against the Company in Civil
District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana as owners of the
SPAR seeking additional damages allegedly sustained by Dominion resulting
from delays in McDermott's delivery of the SPAR caused by the removal
and replacement of coatings containing lead and/or lead chromate. Dominion
contends that the Company made certain misrepresentations and warranties
to Dominion concerning the lead-free nature of those coatings. Dominion's
petition as filed alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified amount;
however, Dominion's economic expert recently estimated Dominion's damages
at approximately $128 million, a figure which the Company contests.
This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established.
The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to this action.
Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company
is not in a position to evaluate the ultimate outcome of this matter.
In addition, certain other claims, suits and complaints that arise in the ordinary
course of business, have been filed or are pending against the Company.
Management believes that these matters are either adequately reserved,
covered by insurance, or would not have a material effect on the Company's
financial position or its results of operations if disposed of unfavorably.
The Company is subject to
federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the environment
and is currently participating in administrative proceedings at several
sites under these laws. While the Company finds it difficult to estimate
with any certainty the total cost of remediation at the several sites,
on the basis of currently available information and reserves provided,
the Company believes that the outcome of such environmental regulatory
proceedings will not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or its results of operations.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as
of November 30, 2004 pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to
the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be
included in the Company's periodic Securities and Exchange Commission
filings. No significant changes were made in the Company's internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls
subsequent to November 30, 2004.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46-R,"Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities," to replace FIN No. 46. FIN No. 46-R
addresses the consolidation of business enterprises ("variable interest
entities") to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority voting
interest) of consolidation does not apply. FIN No. 46-R focuses on financial
interests that indicate control. It concludes that in the absence of
clear control through voting interests or sufficient equity, a company's
exposure ("variable interest") to the economic risks and potential rewards
from the variable interest entity's assets and activities are the best
evidence of control. Variable interests are rights and obligations that
convey economic gains or losses from changes in the values of the variable
interest entity's assets and liabilities. Variable interests may arise
from financial instruments, service contracts, nonvoting ownership interests
and other arrangements. If an enterprise holds a majority of the variable
interests of an entity, it would be considered the primary beneficiary.
The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets, liabilities
and the results of operations of the variable interest entity in its
financial statements. The adoption of FIN No. 46-R did not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to SFAS No. 132, "Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits." The revision
to SFAS No. 132 requires additional disclosures relating to the description
of the types of plan assets, investment strategy, measurement dates,
plan obligations, cash flows, and components of net periodic benefit
cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement
plans recognized during interim periods. These disclosure requirements
are effective for the Company for the year ended November 30, 2004.
Disclosures required under SFAS No. 132 are included in Note 15 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2004
Annual Report.
In January 2004, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Position ("FSP") regarding
SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions." FSP 106-1, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related
to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act
of 2003," discusses the effect of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement
and Modernization Act ("the Act") enacted on December 8, 2003. FSP 106-1
considers the effect of the two new features introduced in the Act in
determining accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") and
net periodic postretirement benefit cost, which may serve to reduce
a company's post-retirement benefit costs. Companies may elect to defer
accounting for this benefit or may attempt to reflect the best estimate
of the impact of the Act on net periodic costs currently. The Company
has chosen to defer accounting for the benefit until the FASB issues
final accounting guidance due to various uncertainties related to this
legislation and the appropriate accounting. The Company's measures of
APBO and net periodic postretirement benefit costs as of and for the
periods ended November 30, 2004 do not reflect the effect of the Act.
In May 2004, the FASB issued a second FSP regarding SFAS No. 106.
FSP 106-2,"Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003," discusses
the effect of the Act. FSP 106-2 considers the effect of the two new
features introduced in the Act in determining APBO and net periodic
postretirement benefit cost, which may serve to reduce a company's post
> >
> >retirement benefit costs. The adoption of FSP 106-2 did not have a material
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,"Inventory Costs,"
which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 will
be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payments."
SFAS No. 123(R) would require the Company to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense
in its consolidated financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
will require additional accounting related to the income tax effects
and additional disclosure regarding the cash flow effects resulting
from share-based payment arrangements. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective
beginning in the quarter ending November 30, 2005. The effect of the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) is expected to be comparable to the effect
disclosed on a pro forma basis as a result of applying the current fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 as shown in Note 12 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2004 Annual
Report.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Any of the statements contained in this Annual Report that refer to the Company's
forecasted, estimated or anticipated future results are forward-looking
and reflect the Company's current analysis of existing trends and information.
Actual results may differ from current expectations based on a number
of factors affecting Ameron's businesses, including competitive conditions
and changing market conditions. In addition, matters affecting the economy
generally, including the state of economies worldwide, can affect the
Company's results. These forward-looking statements represent the Company's
judgment only as of the date of this Annual Report. Since actual results
could differ materially, the reader is cautioned not to rely on these
forward-looking statements. Moreover, the Company disclaims any intent
or obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
|