CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Ameron International Corporation ("Ameron" or the "Company") is a multinational manufacturer of highly-engineered products and
materials for the chemical, industrial, energy, transportation and infrastructure markets. Ameron is a leading producer of water
transmission lines; high-performance coatings and finishes for the protection of metals and structures; fiberglass-composite pipe for
transporting oil, chemicals and corrosive fluids; and specialized materials and products used in infrastructure projects. The Company
operates businesses in North America, South America, Europe, Australasia and Asia. The Company has four reportable segments. The
Performance Coatings & Finishes Group manufactures and markets high-performance industrial and marine coatings. The Fiberglass-
Composite Pipe Group manufactures and markets filament-wound and molded composite fiberglass pipe, tubing, fittings and well screens.
The Water Transmission Group manufactures and supplies concrete and steel pressure pipe, concrete non-pressure pipe, protective linings
for pipe, and fabricated steel products.The Infrastructure Products Group manufactures and sells ready-mix concrete, sand and aggregates,
concrete pipe and culverts, and concrete and steel lighting and traffic poles. The markets served by the Performance Coatings & Finishes
Group and the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group are worldwide in scope. The Water Transmission Group serves primarily the western U.S.
The Infrastructure Products Group's quarry and ready-mix business operates exclusively in Hawaii, and poles are sold throughout the U.S.
Ameron also participates in several joint-venture companies, directly in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, and indirectly in Egypt.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources and Results of Operations are based upon the Company's
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities during the
reporting periods. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is provided
in Note (1) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in the
Company's 2005 Annual Report. In addition, Management believes the following accounting policies affect the more significant
estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ameron
International Corporation and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.The functional
currencies for the Company's foreign operations are
the applicable local currencies.The translation from the applicable foreign
currencies to U.S.dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using
current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for
revenue and expense accounts using a weighted-average exchange
rate during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). The Company advances
funds to certain foreign subsidiaries that are not expected to be repaid
in the foreseeable future.Translation adjustments
arising from these advances are also included in accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss). The timing of repayments of intercompany advances could
materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, earnings of foreign
subsidiaries are often reinvested outside the U.S. Unforeseen repatriation
of such earnings could result in significant unrecognized U.S. tax
liability. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions
are included in other income, net.
Revenue for the Performance Coatings & Finishes, Fiberglass-Composite Pipe and Infrastructure Products segments is recognized when risk of
ownership and title pass, primarily at the time goods are shipped, provided that an agreement exists between the customer and the Company, the
price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. In limited circumstances within the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group,
revenue recognition associated with shipment of coatings for marine dry dockings is delayed until product returns are processed. Revenue is
recognized for the Water Transmission Group primarily under the percentage-of-completion method, typically based on completed units of
production, since products are manufactured under enforceable and binding construction contracts, are typically designed for specific applications,
are not interchangeable between projects, and are not manufactured for stock. In some cases, if products are manufactured for stock or are not
related to specific construction contracts, revenue is recognized under the same criteria used by the other three segments. Revenue under the
percentage-of-completion method is subject to a greater level of estimation, which affects the timing of revenue recognition, costs and profits.
Estimates are reviewed on a consistent basis and are adjusted periodically to reflect current expectations.
The Company expenses environmental clean-up costs related to existing
conditions resulting from past or current operations on a site-by-site
basis. Liabilities and costs associated with these matters, as well
as other pending litigation and asserted claims arising in the ordinary
course of business,
require estimates of future costs and judgments based on the knowledge
and experience of management and its legal counsel.When the Company's
exposures can be reasonably estimated and are probable, liabilities and
expenses are recorded. The ultimate resolution of any such exposure
to the Company may differ due to subsequent developments.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined
principally on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method.Certain steel
inventories used by the Water Transmission Group are valued using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. Significant changes in steel
inventory levels or costs could materially impact the Company's financial statements. Reserves are established for excess, obsolete and
rework inventories based on age, estimates of salability and forecasted future demand. Management records an allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable based on historical experience and expected trends. A significant reduction in demand or a significant worsening of
customer credit quality could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures or affiliates ("joint ventures") over which the Company has significant influence are accounted
for under the equity method of accounting, whereby the investment is carried at the cost of acquisition, plus the Company's equity in
undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition. Investments in joint ventures over which the Company does not have the ability to exert
significant influence over the investees' operating and financing activities are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. The
Company's investment in TAMCO, a steel mini-mill in California, is accounted for under the equity method. Investments in Ameron Saudi
Arabia, Ltd.,Bondstrand, Ltd. and Oasis-Ameron, Ltd. are accounted for under the cost method due to management's current assessment of
the Company's influence over these joint ventures.
Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost and
is depreciated principally using a straight-line method based on the
estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to 40 years.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such
assets may
not be recoverable. If the estimated future, undiscounted cash flows
from the use of an asset are less than its carrying value,
a write-down is recorded to reduce the related assets to estimated fair value.
The Company also reviews intangible assets for impairment at least
annually, based on the estimated future, discounted cash flows associated
with such assets.Actual cash flows may differ significantly
from estimated cash flows.Additionally, current estimates of future cash flows
may differ from subsequent estimates of future cash flows. Changes
in estimated or actual cash flows could materially impact the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
The Company is self insured for a portion of the losses and liabilities
primarily associated with workers' compensation claims and general,
product and
vehicle liability. Losses are accrued based upon the Company's estimates
of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using
historical experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The estimate of self insurance liability includes
an estimate of incurred but not reported claims, based on data compiled from historical experience. Actual experience could differ
significantly from these estimates and could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company follows the guidance of Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions,"
and SFAS No. 106, "Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions," when accounting for pension and other
postretirement benefits. Under these accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and, in
certain cases, the performance of plan assets that are controlled and invested by third-party fiduciaries. Delayed recognition of differences
between actual results and expected or estimated results is a guiding principle of these standards. Such delayed recognition provides a
gradual recognition of benefit obligations and investment performance over the working lives of the employees who benefit under the plans,
based on various assumptions.Assumed discount rates are used to calculate the present value of benefit payments which are projected to
be made in the future, including projections of increases in employee's annual compensation and health care costs. Management also
projects the future return on invested assets based principally on prior performance and future expectations.These projected returns reduce
the net benefit costs the Company records in the current period.Management consults with actuaries when determining these assumptions.
Actual results could vary significantly from projected results, and such deviation could materially impact the Company's consolidated
financial statements. Unforecasted program changes, including termination, freezing of benefits or acceleration of benefits, could result in
an immediate recognition of unrecognized benefit obligations; and such recognition could materially impact the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
During 2005, the Company changed the assumed discount rate and projected
rates of increase in compensation levels and health care costs. The
discount rate is based on market interest rates.At November 30, 2005,
the Company decreased the discount rate from 5.85% to 5.60%
as a result of the market interest rates on long-term,fixed-rate debt securities
of highly-rated corporations. In estimating the expected return on
assets, the Company considers past performance and future expectations
for various types of investments as well as the expected longterm
allocation of assets. At November 30, 2005, the Company maintained the
expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption at 8.75% to
reflect expectations for future returns from investments in the equity
markets. In projecting the rate of increase in compensation
levels, the Company considers movements in inflation rates as reflected
by market interest rates. At November 30, 2005, the Company decreased
the assumed annual rate of compensation increase from 3.35% to 3.10%.
In selecting the rate of increase in health care costs, the
Company considers past performance and forecasts of future health care
cost trends.At November 30, 2005, the Company increased the rate of
increase in health care costs from 9.00% to 10.00%, decreasing ratably until reaching 5.00% in 2010 and beyond.
Different assumptions would impact the Company's projected benefit
obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs related to pensions,
and the accrued other benefit obligations and benefit costs related to
postretirement benefits. The following reflects the impact associated
with a change in certain assumptions (in thousands):
| |
1% Increase |
1% Decrease |
| |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Discount Rate:
Pensions |
$(27,174) |
$ (2,666) |
$33,478 |
$ 3,167 |
Discount Rate:
Other postretirement benefits |
(345) |
(51) |
407 |
52 |
| Expected rate of return on assets |
Not Applicable |
(1,555) |
Not Applicable |
1,555 |
| Rate of increase in compensation levels |
5,435 |
918 |
(4,873) |
(832) |
| Rate of increase in health care costs |
189 |
38 |
(160) |
(33) |
Additional information regarding pensions and other postretirement benefits is
disclosed in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
the Company's 2005 Annual Report.
Management incentive compensation is accrued based on current estimates of the Company's ability to achieve short-term and long-term
performance targets.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences
between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations
are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which
the differences are expected to reverse.Valuation allowances are established,
when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the
amounts expected to be realized. Quarterly income taxes are estimated based
on the mix of income by jurisdiction forecasted for the full fiscal
year. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for tax-related
matters. The Company is subject to examination by taxing
authorities in various jurisdictions. Matters raised upon audit may involve
substantial amounts, and an adverse finding could have a material impact
on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During 2005, the Company generated $37.2 million of cash from operating activities compared to $10.1 million in the same period in 2004. The
higher operating cash flow in 2005 was primarily due to higher earnings, excluding the gains on property sales in 2004 and 2005, partially offset by
an increase in net operating capital. The increase in operating assets was the result of higher receivables and inventories due to higher sales.
Operating liabilities increased due to higher trade payables and pension liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $21.5 million in 2005,
compared to $4.2 million provided by investing activities in 2004.
Net cash used in 2005 for investing activities consisted of proceeds
from the sale of assets, including $1.8 million from the sale of excess
property held by the
Company's European coatings business, offset by capital expenditures which
were primarily for normal replacement and upgrades of machinery and
equipment and for a new fiberglass pipe plant in Malaysia. In 2004,
the Company generated $15.3 million from the sale of property vacated
as
part of a plant consolidation within the Water Transmission Group, and $7.2
million from the liquidation of life insurance policies. During the
fiscal year ending November 30, 2006, the Company anticipates spending
between approximately $25 and $35 million on capital expenditures.
Capital
expenditures are expected to be funded by existing cash balances, cash generated
from operations or additional borrowings.
No net cash was provided
by financing activities in 2005, compared to $5.0 million used in 2004.
Cash used in 2005 consisted of payment of
common stock dividends of $6.8 million, debt issuance costs of $.3 million,
offset by issuance of debt of $2.4 million, and a net $4.8 million
from the issuance of common stock related to the exercise of stock
options and treasury shares used to pay withholding taxes on vested
restricted shares.
In November 2005, the Company amended and extended a $100.0 million
revolving credit facility with six banks (the "Revolver"). Under the
amendment, the maturity date of the Revolver was extended to September 2010. Under the Revolver, the Company may, at its option, borrow at
floating interest rates based on specified margins over money market rates, at any time until September 2010, when all borrowings under the
Revolver must be repaid. Also in November 2005, the Company issued SGD51.0 million, equivalent to approximately US$30.0 million, of senior
secured notes payable to an insurance company at a fixed rate of 4.25% per annum. Proceeds from the notes payable were used to repatriate
earnings from a foreign subsidiary in connection with The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. These fixed-rate notes are payable in Singapore
dollars equivalent to approximately US$6.0 million per year, beginning in November 2008,with a final maturity in November 2012.
The Company's lending agreements contain various restrictive covenants,
including the requirement to maintain specified amounts of net worth
and restrictions on cash dividends, borrowings, liens, investments and guarantees.The
Company is required to maintain consolidated net worth of $181.4 million
plus 50% of net income and 75% of proceeds from any equity issued after
January 24, 2003. The Company's consolidated net worth
exceeded the covenant amount by $79.2 million as of November 30, 2005. The
Company is required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated
funded indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization ("EBITDA") of no more than 2.5 times. As of
November 30, 2005, the Company maintained a consolidated leverage ratio of
1.32 times EBITDA. Lending agreements require that the Company maintain
qualified consolidated tangible assets at least equal to the outstanding
secured funded indebtedness.As of November 30, 2005, qualifying tangible
assets equaled 2.05 times funded indebtedness. Under the most restrictive
fixed charge coverage ratio, the sum of EBITDA and rental
expense less cash taxes must be at least 1.25 times the sum of interest expense,
rental expense, dividends and scheduled funded debt payments.As of
November 30, 2005, the Company maintained such a fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1.72 times.
Cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2005 totaled $44.7 million,
an increase of $14.5 million from November 30, 2004.At November 30,
2005,
the Company had total debt outstanding of $95.4 million and approximately
$118.0 million in unused committed and uncommitted credit lines available
from foreign and domestic banks. The Company's highest borrowing
and the average borrowing levels during 2005 were $128.1 million
and $107.0 million, respectively. Debt and cash increased at November 30,
2005 partly due to the timing of the issuance of the fixed-rate notes
outlined above.
Management believes that cash flows from operations and current cash balances,
together with currently available lines of credit will be sufficient
to meet operating requirements in 2006. The Company expects to contribute
$16.6 million to the U.S. pension plan and $1.3 million for the non-
U.S. pension plan in 2006. Cash available from operations could be affected
by any general economic downturn or any downturn or any decline or
adverse changes in the Company's business, such as loss of customers
or significant raw material price increases.Management believes it
is unlikely
that business or economic conditions will worsen or that operating costs
will increase sufficiently to impact short-term liquidity.
The Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments
at November 30, 2005 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period |
| Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Long-Term Debt (a) |
$ 95,442 |
$ 18,333 |
$ 26,031 |
$ 23,313 |
$ 27,765 |
| Interest Payments on Debt |
19,419 |
4,603 |
6,260 |
3,348 |
5,208 |
| Operating Leases |
42,430 |
4,619 |
8,490 |
7,440 |
21,881 |
| Purchase Obligations (b) |
1,333 |
1,333 |
- |
- |
- |
| Total Contractual Obligations (c) |
$158,624 |
$ 28,888 |
$ 40,781 |
$ 34,101 |
$ 54,854 |
| |
| Commitments Expiring Per Period |
| Commercial Commitments |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Standby Letters of Credit (d) |
$ 2,010 |
$ 2,010 |
— |
— |
— |
| Total Commercial Commitments (c) |
$ 2,010 |
$ 2,010 |
— |
— |
— |
(a) Included in long-term debt is $1,251 outstanding under a revolving
credit facility which is supported by the Revolver.
(b) Obligation to purchase sand used in the Company's ready-mix operations
in Hawaii.
(c) The Company has no capitalized lease obligations, guarantees or
standby repurchase obligations.
(d)
Not included are standby letters of credit totaling $16,065 supporting industrial
development bonds with principal of $15,700. The principal amount of
the industrial development bonds is included in long-term debt. The
standby letters of credit are issued under the Revolver.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2005 COMPARED WITH 2004
General
Net income totaled $32.6 million, or $3.80 per diluted share, on sales of $704.6 million for the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to net
income of $13.5 million, or $1.59 per diluted share, on sales of $605.9 million for the same period in 2004. Net income rose in 2005 primarily due
to improved operations. Additionally, net income in 2004 was adversely impacted by labor strikes, the costs associated with the termination of two
executive benefit plans and increased reserves associated with LIFO accounting of certain steel inventories, partially offset by the gain on the sale
of property.
All operating segments had higher sales and segment income in 2005
compared to 2004. The Water Transmission Group had record sales in
2005 due principally to a major sewer upgrade project in Northern California.
The Infrastructure Products Group had significantly higher sales and
profits due to the strong construction sector in Hawaii and throughout the
U.S. In 2004, the Water Transmission and Infrastructure Products Groups
were disrupted by labor strikes.The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group achieved
record sales and profits in 2005 as a result of the increased demand
for oilfield piping in North America, continued strong demand in the marine
market worldwide and increased shipments to the Middle East from
Ameron's Asian operations. The Performance Coatings & Finishes Group had higher sales, primarily from U.S. operations, due to improved market
conditions, and from operations in Australia and New Zealand, due to volume gains and favorable currency translation. Equity income from
TAMCO,Ameron's 50%-owned steel mini-mill in Southern California, declined $1.8 million from 2004's record level. The decline was attributable
to higher conversion costs, primarily energy costs.
Sales
Sales increased $98.7 million in 2005, compared to 2004. Sales increased due to a large sewer pipe project, increased demand for protective
lining products, higher demand for onshore oilfield piping, the impact of foreign exchange rates on the Company's foreign coatings and
fiberglass pipe operations and higher demand for concrete and steel poles due to the continued strength of housing construction throughout
the U.S. Prior-year sales were adversely impacted by the labor strikes within the Water Transmission and Infrastructure Products Groups.
Performance Coatings & Finishes' sales increased $10.2 million in 2005. The sales increase resulted from improved market conditions in
the U.S., higher selling prices, higher shipments of lighter-duty product finishes by Ameron's Australian and New Zealand operations, and
favorable foreign currency exchange rates. Ameron's European coatings operations had essentially flat sales as lower shipments to the
Middle East and lower intumescent sales due to timing of product introductions offset selling price gains in Europe.The relative strength of
the euro and the British pound constrained exports of Ameron's European operations, and sales of marine coatings declined primarily due
to the loss in the middle of 2004 of a contract to supply coatings to the U.S.Navy. The U.S. coatings market has strengthened, and orders are
increasing. The Performance Coatings & Finishes Group should benefit as the U.S.market improves. In addition, the business is expected to
participate in the rebuilding of the chemical, oil and industrial infrastructure along the U.S. Gulf Coast.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's sales increased $17.8 million in 2005 due primarily to demand for onshore oilfield piping in the U.S.
and Canada, higher fiberglass pipe demand for marine applications and increased shipments from Ameron's Asian operations of fiberglass
pipe to the Middle East for industrial projects. Sales of piping supplied by Ameron's operations in Europe declined due to market conditions
and the impact of the appreciated euro on exports into the Middle East and the former Soviet Union. The strength of demand for oilfield
and marine piping continues to be driven by high oil prices and the high cost of steel piping, the principal substitute for fiberglass pipe.
Ameron's new state-of-the-art fiberglass pipe plant in Malaysia is scheduled to begin production during the second quarter of 2006. The
backlog for the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group increased compared to the level at year-end 2004, and the key market segments such as
oilfield and marine remain strong. The outlook for the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group is favorable.
The Water Transmission Group's sales increased $38.5 million in 2005
compared to the same period in 2004. The sales improvement was primarily
due to pipe sales for a major sewer upgrade project in Northern California,
higher demand for protective lining products that are
used to provide corrosion protection of concrete sewer pipe, and sales of towers
used for wind-powered electrical generation. Also, the Group's operations
and sales were adversely affected by labor disputes at two plants in
2004. Revenue is recognized in the Water
Transmission Group primarily under the percentage of completion method and
is subject to a certain level of estimation,which affects the timing
of revenue recognition, costs and profits. Estimates are reviewed on
a consistent basis and are adjusted when actual results are
expected to significantly differ from those estimates. The Water Transmission Group entered 2006 with a lower backlog due to completion
of most of the major sewer project. Market conditions remain soft due to fiscal constraints and continuation of a cyclical slowdown in water
infrastructure spending in the Company's markets.
Infrastructure Products' sales increased $32.7 million in 2005 compared
to 2004 due to higher housing and commercial construction spending
in Hawaii and throughout the U.S. In addition, Ameron's Hawaiian operations
recovered from a labor dispute in 2004 at the
Company's principal aggregates and ready-mix concrete operations on Oahu
in Hawaii. Construction spending in Hawaii and demand for aggregates
and ready-mix concrete used for public infrastructure, housing and
military construction, remain strong. Sales of steel and
concrete poles increased due to the continued strength of housing construction
throughout the U.S. Additionally,Ameron benefited from a major pole-replacement
program sponsored by a utility in Southern California. The forecast
for the Infrastructure Products Group remains
positive due to expectations of continued high level of spending on residential,
commercial, and military construction spurred partly by low interest
rates.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2005 was $182.1 million, or 25.8% of sales, compared to gross profit of $148.4 million, or 24.5% of sales, in 2004. Gross profit
increased $33.7 million due to higher sales and improved margins due to a favorable mix of projects.
In 2005, gross profit of the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group was essentially equal to gross profit in 2004. Higher profit of $2.9 million
from increased sales was offset by lower margins. Profit margins were adversely impacted by higher raw material costs and underutilization
of plant capacity.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $.8
million in 2005 compared to gross profit in 2004 due to higher sales.
Higher sales generated $6.2 million higher gross profit, offset by lower
margins of $5.4 million due to an unfavorable shift in product mix
to industrial and onshore oilfield from higher margin offshore applications,
higher raw material costs and lower plant utilization in Europe.
Gross profit of the Water Transmission Group increased $16.0 million
in 2005 compared to gross profit in 2004. Gross profit increased $7.6
million
because of higher sales and $8.4 million due to higher margins. Profit
margins were higher largely due to a favorable change in
product and project mix due primarily to the large sewer project. Profits
were impacted in 2004 by inefficient plant utilization caused by two
labor strikes, higher workers' compensation costs and weak market conditions.
The margins on projects in backlog at the beginning of
2006 are lower than achieved in 2005 due to the soft market in the western
U.S. and competitive pressures.
The Infrastructure Products Group's
gross profit increased $8.4 million compared to gross profit in 2004.
Gross profit increased $6.7 million
from higher sales and $1.7 million due to higher margins. Profit margins
were higher due to improved plant utilization, improved pricing, and
a favorable change in product mix. Plant operating efficiency had been
adversely affected by a labor strike in Hawaii in 2004.
Additionally, consolidated gross profit was $8.4 million lower in
2004 compared to the same period in 2005 due primarily to increased
reserves in 2004
associated with LIFO accounting of certain steel inventories used by
the Water Transmission Group. The LIFO method is
used to defer income taxes on operating profit of the Water Transmission Group. Income taxes and the LIFO reserves are not allocated to
the operating segments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")
SG&A totaled $146.0 million, or 20.7% of sales, in 2005, compared to $137.5 million, or 22.7% in 2004. SG&A increased $8.5 million due to
higher legal expenses of $5.1 million, higher severance costs of $1.2 million, higher stock and incentive compensation expense of $3.4
million, offset by insurance recoveries of $1.5 million.
Pension Plan Curtailment/Settlement
In June 2004, the Company terminated two executive benefit plans and incurred a pretax expense of $12.8 million due to the termination of
the plans and distribution to plan participants.
Other Income, Net
Other income decreased to $7.1 million in 2005 from $17.9 million in 2004. Other income included royalties and fees from licensees, foreign
currency transaction gains and losses, and other miscellaneous income. Included in 2004 was a gain of $13.1 million on the sale of excess
property vacated as part of a program to streamline pipe manufacturing operations within the Water Transmission Group. Included in 2005
was a gain of $1.8 million on the sale of excess properties held by the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group. Income from investments
accounted for under the cost method increased from $.4 million in 2004 to $1.8 million in 2005 due to the timing of dividend payments.
The fiberglass pipe and coatings ventures continued to perform well due to the strength of oilfield and infrastructure markets in Saudi
Arabia. The concrete pipe venture experienced a cyclical lull and increased competition from alternative products.
Interest
Net interest expense totaled $5.2 million in 2005, compared to $5.3 million in 2004. The decrease reflected higher interest income from
short-term investments offset partially by higher average borrowing levels and slightly higher interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to $14.5 million compared to $8.0 million in 2004. The effective tax rate decreased from 75% in 2004 to 38% in 2005.
The effective tax rate was significantly higher in 2004 due to IRS limitations on the deductibility of a portion of the settlements associated
with the executive benefit plan termination. Approximately $18.5 million of the $24.7 million paid to participants of the terminated plans
did not receive an associated tax benefit. Excluding the impact of the termination of the benefit plans, the effective rate in 2005 would have
been higher than in 2004 due to higher levels of earnings from domestic operations. Income from certain foreign operations is taxed at rates
that are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates. Also, the rate in 2005 was higher as a result of the one-time repatriation of foreign earnings
under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity income, which consists of Ameron's share of the results of TAMCO, decreased from $10.8 million in 2004 to $9.0 million in 2005.
Ameron owns 50% of TAMCO, a mini-mill that produces steel rebar for the construction industry in the western U.S. Equity income is
shown net of income taxes. Dividends from TAMCO are taxed at an effective rate of 10.4%, reflecting the dividend exclusion provided to the
Company under current tax laws. The decline in TAMCO's earnings was attributable principally to higher conversion costs,primarily energy.
TAMCO sales in 2005 were at a record level, reflecting the continued strong construction market and the high prices of steel worldwide.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2004 COMPARED WITH 2003
General
Net income totaled $13.5 million, or $1.59 per diluted share, on sales of $605.9 million for the year ended November 30, 2004, compared to
net income of $29.9 million, or $3.67 per diluted share, on sales of $600.5 million for the same period in 2003.All operating segments had
higher sales except the Water Transmission Group. Sales of the Water Transmission Group declined in 2004 because of labor disputes that
resulted in strikes at two of its plants and weak demand in its primary market, the western U.S.Net income was lower in 2004 as lower gross
profits, higher SG&A and the curtailment and settlement costs associated with the termination of the benefit plans were partially offset by
higher other income, lower taxes and higher equity in the earnings of TAMCO. Excluding income from joint ventures, the Fiberglass-
Composite Pipe Group had higher segment income, while the Performance Coatings & Finishes,Water Transmission and Infrastructure
Products Groups had lower segment income.
Sales
Sales increased $5.4 million in 2004, compared to 2003. Sales increased
due to the impact of changing foreign exchange rates on the Company's
foreign coatings and fiberglass pipe operations and higher demand for
poles, partially offset by reduced demand in markets
served by the Water Transmission Group.
Performance Coatings & Finishes' sales increased $9.3 million in 2004 due to
the appreciation of foreign currencies relative to the U.S.dollar. Sales in
local currencies by operations outside the U.S. increased, while sales in the
U.S. were lower. Improvements came from sales of fire
protection coatings in Europe and coil coatings in New Zealand. Sales of protective
coatings in the U.S. and Europe declined as a result of continued weakness
in spending in the heavy-industrial and chemical markets. Additionally, sales
of coatings for use in offshore oil and gas
exploration and production weakened in 2004 as offshore construction slowed
in the U.S. The anticipated upturn in spending by industrial customers in the
U.S. and Europe remained slower than expected in 2004.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $1.7 million in 2004 due
primarily to the impact of favorable foreign exchange rates and partly
to the strength
of Asian operations. Asian operations, which serve the marine construction
markets located in Korea, China and Japan,
benefited from the strong worldwide demand for oil tankers and offshore
production vessels. New marine construction in Asia increased due to
high oil prices and
regulations requiring double-hull tankers. The industrial markets in the
U.S. and Europe remained slow due to
general economic conditions and a shift of new facilities to Asia and other
developing markets. Sales in the U.S.were down due to the weak industrial
market and lower activity in the U.S. offshore construction market.
Sales of oilfield
tubing for onshore applications were flat as
spending was concentrated on larger offshore projects constructed in Asia.
The Water Transmission Group's sales decreased $11.3 million in 2004
due to weak market conditions and labor disputes at two of the Group's principal plants in Southern California in the first half of 2004. Workers at the two plants struck in early February. Agreement was
reached at one of the plants in the first quarter, at the end of February, and the second plant in the second quarter, at the end of March. Sales
of protective-lining products for sewer pipe also declined due to a cyclical slowdown in the waste water market and increased competition
from alternative products and suppliers.Water Transmission's year-end backlog was significantly higher than at the end of 2003 as a series
of large projects were successfully bid.
Infrastructure Products' sales increased $5.8 million in 2004 due
to strong housing and commercial construction spending, which was spurred
by low interest rates. Ameron's Hawaiian operations recovered from
a labor dispute at the Company's principal aggregates and
ready-mix concrete operations on Oahu in Hawaii which began in February and
ended in early April. Construction spending in Hawaii was deferred
during the strike. Ameron's pole business had higher sales of concrete
poles used in street lighting, primarily associated with
housing starts. Sales of steel traffic poles also increased.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2004 was $148.4 million, or 24.5% of sales, compared to gross profit of $166.5 million, or 27.7% of sales, in 2003.Gross profit
decreased $18.1 million due to lower margins, the impact in the first half of the strikes on plant utilization and a net $7.3 million expense
related to an increase in LIFO reserves caused by higher steel prices.
In 2004, gross profit of the Performance Coatings & Finishes Group was flat compared to gross profit in 2003. Higher profit of $2.8 million
from increased sales was offset by a similar reduction in gross profit due to lower margins.Profit margins were adversely impacted by higher
manufacturing costs of $1.8 million in the U.S. and Europe, due to inefficient plant utilization, and higher raw material costs of $.7 million.
The Group was unable to increase prices sufficiently to cover additional costs due to competitive pressures, especially in dollar-based
markets in the Middle East and the former Soviet Union served by the Company's European operations.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $2.4
million in 2004 due to higher sales and improved margins.Higher sales
generated $.6 million higher gross profit, while improved margins contributed
$1.8 million. The margin increase resulted from the mix of products
sold in 2004, especially from Asian operations which benefited from
the strength of local markets, and improved conditions in
worldwide oilfield markets.
Gross profit of the Water Transmission Group decreased $11.1 million
in 2004. Gross profit decreased $2.7 million because of lower sales
and $8.4
million due to lower margins. Profit margins were lower due to competitive
pressures brought on by slow market conditions and
increased workers' compensation costs of $1.2 million.Margins in 2004 and
2003 were adversely affected by the San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge
project, for which the Water Transmission Group provided lower-margin
steel pilings. Deliveries to the San Francisco/Oakland Bay
Bridge project were completed in 2004.
The Infrastructure Products Group's gross profit declined slightly
as profit on higher sales was offset by slightly lower margins. Margins
declined
due to wet weather and the labor dispute in Hawaii in the first half
of 2004, reducing profits $1.6 million. Higher concrete poles
sales generated increased gross profit of approximately $1.3 million.
Additionally, consolidated gross profit was $7.8 million lower in
2004 compared to the same period in 2003 due primarily to increased
reserves associated with LIFO accounting of certain steel inventories used by the Water Transmission Group. The LIFO method is used to
defer income taxes on operating profit of the Water Transmission Group. Income taxes and the LIFO reserves are not allocated to the
operating segments. Gross profit was also $1.3 million lower as a result of other inventory adjustments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A totaled $137.5 million, or 22.7% of sales, in 2004, compared to $127.4 million, or 21.2%, in 2003. SG&A increased $10.1 million due to higher
costs of third-party insurance coverage of $2.2 million, higher legal and consulting expenses of $3.4 million and Sarbanes-Oxley 404 auditing and
implementation costs of $3.5 million,offset by lower compensation expenses of $1.9 million.The appreciation of foreign currencies increased SG&A
of foreign operations by approximately $3.9 million. Additionally in 2003, SG&A included a legal expense recovery of $1.0 million, representing
amounts agreed to be reimbursed to the Company by its own and a supplier's insurance companies for past legal fees and costs in excess of the
negotiated settlement of the Central Arizona Project lawsuit. Pension Plan Curtailment/Settlement
In June 2004, the Company terminated two executive benefit plans in consideration of ongoing costs, anticipated legislative restrictions on
such programs, and a preference for executive benefit plans having more predictable costs. The Company incurred a pretax expense of $12.8
million due to the termination of the plans and distributions to plan participants. The Company recorded this expense in accordance with
SFAS No. 88, "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits." SFAS
No. 88 requires settlement accounting if the cost of all settlements, including lump-sum retirement benefits paid, in a year exceeds, or is
expected to exceed, the total of the service and interest cost components of pension expense for the same period. In addition to the
termination and settlement costs,Ameron expensed $1.8 million under the plans in 2004 and $2.1 million in 2003.Other
Income, Net
Other income increased to $17.9 million in 2004 from $10.9 million in 2003.Other income included royalties and fees from licensees, foreign
currency transaction gains and losses, and other miscellaneous income. Included in 2004 was a gain of $13.1 million on the sale of excess
property vacated as part of a program to streamline pipe manufacturing operations within the Water Transmission Group. Included in 2003
was a gain of $2.5 million on the sale of Ameron's minority interest in a Mexican coatings venture. Income from investments accounted for
under the cost method decreased from $6.3 million in 2003 to $.5 million in 2004 due to the timing of dividend payments. The fiberglass
pipe and coatings ventures continued to perform well due to the strength of oilfield and infrastructure markets in Saudi Arabia.The concrete
pipe venture experienced a cyclical lull and increased competition from alternative products.
Interest
Interest expense totaled $5.3 million in 2004, compared to $6.6 million in 2003. The decrease reflected lower average borrowing levels in
combination with lower average effective interest rates related to the repayment of fixed-rate debt with a higher interest rate and increased
utilization of floating-rate debt.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes declined to $8.0 million compared to $14.0 million in 2003. The effective tax rate increased from 32% in 2003 to 75% in 2004.
The effective tax rate was significantly higher in 2004 due to IRS limitations on the deductibility of a portion of the settlements associated
with the executive benefit plan terminations.Approximately $18.5 million of the $24.7 million paid to participants of the terminated plans
did not receive an associated tax benefit. Excluding the impact of the termination of the benefit plans, the effective rate in 2004 would have
been less than in 2003 due to lower level of earnings from domestic operations. Income from certain foreign operations is taxed at rates that
are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity income, which consists of Ameron's share of the results of TAMCO, increased from $.6 million in 2003 to $10.8 million in 2004.
TAMCO performed well throughout 2004 due to increased demand for steel rebar and higher selling prices. The worldwide market for steel
products increased dramatically in 2004 because of demand for steel in China.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing, other than listed
in the Liquidity and Capital Resources Section herein. All of the Company's
subsidiaries are included in the financial statements, and the Company
does not have relationships with any special purpose entities.
CONTINGENCIES
The Company is one of numerous defendants in various asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified
damages for asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by the Company and others, and at
this time the Company is generally not aware of the extent of injuries allegedly suffered by the individuals or the facts supporting the claim
that injuries were caused by the Company's products.Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not in a position
to evaluate its potential exposure, if any, as a result of such claims or future similar claims, if any, that may be filed.Hence, no amounts have
been accrued for loss contingencies related to these lawsuits in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies." The Company
continues to vigorously defend all such lawsuits.As of November 30, 2005, the Company was a defendant in asbestos-related cases involving
8,906 claimants, compared to 18,298 claimants as of November 30, 2004. The Company is not in a position to estimate the number of
additional claims that may be filed against it in the future. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005, there were new claims involving 72
claimants, dismissals and/or settlements involving 9,464 claimants and no judgments. No net costs and expenses were incurred by the
Company for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 in connection with asbestos-related claims.
The Company is one of numerous defendants in various silica-related personal
injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for silica-related
diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by
the Company and others, and at this
time the Company is not aware of the extent of injuries allegedly suffered
by the individuals or the facts supporting the claim that injuries were caused
by the Company's products. Based upon the information available to it at
this time, the Company is not in a position to evaluate
its potential exposure, if any, as a result of such claims or future similar
claims, if any, that may be filed. Hence, no amounts have been accrued for
loss contingencies related to these lawsuits in accordance with SFAS No.
5. The Company continues to vigorously defend all such
lawsuits. As of November 30, 2005, the Company was a defendant in silica-related
cases involving 7,447 claimants, compared to 8,226 claimants as of November
30, 2004. The Company is not in a position to estimate the number of additional
claims that may be filed against
it in the future. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005, there were new
claims involving 1,187 claimants,dismissals and/or settlements involving
1,966 claimants and no judgments. Net costs and expenses incurred by the
Company for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005
in connection with silica-related claims were approximately $.4 million.
In April 2003, the Company was served with a complaint in an action brought
by J. Ray McDermott, Inc., J. Ray McDermott, S.A. and SparTEC, Inc. (collectively "McDermott") in the District Court of Harris County, Texas against the Company and two co-defendants, in
connection with certain coatings supplied by the defendants in 2002 for an offshore production facility known as a SPAR being constructed
by McDermott for Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (collectively "Dominion"). The
Company reached a settlement with McDermott in May 2005. In May 2003, Dominion brought an action against the Company in Civil
District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana. Dominion seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from delays in McDermott's
delivery of the SPAR caused by the removal and replacement of certain coatings containing lead and/or lead chromate for which McDermott
alleged the Company was responsible. Dominion contends that the Company made certain misrepresentations and warranties to Dominion
concerning the lead-free nature of those coatings. Dominion's petition as filed alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified amount;
however, Dominion's economic expert has since estimated Dominion's damages at approximately $128 million, a figure which the Company
contests. This matter is in discovery and no trial date has yet been established. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to
this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not in a position to evaluate the ultimate outcome of
this matter. Legal costs and expenses related to these lawsuits totaled $5.0 million in 2005.
In April 2004, Sable Offshore Energy Inc. ("Sable"), as agent for certain owners of the Sable Offshore Energy Project, brought an action
against various coatings suppliers and application contractors, including the Company and two of its subsidiaries,Ameron (UK) Limited
and Ameron B.V. (collectively "Ameron Subsidiaries") in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada. Sable seeks damages allegedly
sustained by it resulting from performance problems with several coating systems used on the Sable Offshore Energy Project, including
coatings products furnished by the Company and the Ameron Subsidiaries. Sable's originating notice and statement of claim alleged a claim
for damages in an unspecified amount; however, Sable has since alleged that its claim for damages against all defendants is approximately
428 million Canadian dollars, a figure which the Company and the Ameron Subsidiaries contest. This matter is in discovery, and no trial
date has yet been established. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to this action. Based upon the information available
to it at this time, the Company is not in a position to evaluate the ultimate outcome of this matter.
In addition, certain other claims, suits and complaints that arise in the
ordinary course of business, have been filed or are pending against the Company.Management
believes that these matters are either adequately reserved, covered by insurance,
or would not have a material
effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows, or its results
of operations if disposed of unfavorably.
The Company is subject to federal,
state and local laws and regulations concerning the environment and
is currently participating in
administrative proceedings at several sites under these laws.While the
Company finds it difficult to estimate with any certainty the total
cost of remediation at the several sites, on the basis of currently available
information and reserves provided, the Company believes that the
outcome of such environmental regulatory proceedings will not have a
material
effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows, or its results
of operations.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs," which clarifies the accounting
for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs
incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payments." SFAS No. 123 (R) requires companies to measure all
employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense in their consolidated financial statements. The
adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R) will require additional accounting related to the income tax effects and additional disclosure regarding the cash
flow effects resulting from share-based payment arrangements. The Company is allowed to select either of two alternative transition methods.
Under the first method, the Modified Prospective Application method, SFAS 123 (R) applies to new awards and modified awards after the
effective date, and to any unvested awards as service is rendered on or after the effective date. Under the second method, the Modified
Retrospective Application method, SFAS No. 123 (R) applies to either all prior years for which SFAS No. 123 was effective or only to prior interim
periods in the year of adoption. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 123 (R) using the Modified Prospective Application method. SFAS No.
123 (R) is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2006 and will apply to all outstanding and unvested option awards at adoption date. The
Company has completed a preliminary evaluation of the effect of adoption of SFAS 123 (R). The adoption of SFAS 123 (R) is expected to increase
SG&A by approximately $.2 million in 2006 based upon options outstanding as of November 30, 2005.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Any of the statements contained in this report that refer to the Company's forecasted, estimated or anticipated future results are forwardlooking
and reflect the Company's current analysis of existing trends and information.Actual results may differ from current expectations
based on a number of factors affecting Ameron's businesses, including competitive conditions and changing market conditions. In addition,
matters affecting the economy generally, including the state of economies worldwide, can affect the Company's results. These forwardlooking
statements represent the Company's judgment only as of the date of this report.Since actual results could differ materially, the reader
is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. Moreover, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update these
forward-looking statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company operates internationally, giving rise to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. From time to time,
the Company borrows in various currencies to reduce the level of net assets subject to changes in foreign exchange rates or purchases foreign
exchange forward and option contracts to hedge firm commitments, such as receivables and payables, denominated in foreign currencies.
The Company does not use the contracts for speculative or trading purposes.At November 30, 2005, the Company had 15 foreign currency
forward contracts expiring at various dates through March 2006, with an aggregate notional value and fair value of $5.1 million and $5.0
million, respectively. Such instruments are carried at fair value,with related adjustments recorded in other income. Debt Risk The Company has variable-rate, short-term and long-term debt as well as fixed-rate, long-term debt. The fair value of the Company's fixedrate
debt is subject to changes in interest rates.The estimated fair value of the Company's variable-rate debt approximates the carrying value
of such debt since the variable interest rates are market-based, and the Company believes such debt could be refinanced on materially
similar terms.The Company is subject to the availability of credit to support new requirements, to refinance amortizing long-term debt and
to refinance short-term debt.
As of November 30, 2005, the estimated fair value of notes payable by the
Company totaling $8.3 million, with a fixed rate of 7.92% per annum,was $8.6
million. The Company is required to repay these notes in 2006. As of November
30, 2005, the estimated fair value of notes
payable by the Company totaling $40.0 million,with a fixed rate of 5.36% per
annum,was $40.0 million. The Company is required to repay these notes in annual
installments of $10.0 million from 2006 to 2009, inclusive. As of November
30, 2005, the estimated value of notes
payable by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary in Singapore totaling approximately
$30.2 million, with a fixed rate of 4.25% per annum, was $30.3 million. These
notes must be repaid in installments of approximately $6.0 million per year
beginning in 2008. The
Company had $7.2 million of variable-rate industrial development bonds payable
at a rate of 3.25% per annum as of November 30, 2005, payable in 2016. The
Company also had $8.5 million of variable-rate industrial development bonds
payable at a rate of 3.25% per annum as
of November 30, 2005, payable in 2021. The industrial revenue bonds are supported
by the Revolver. The Company borrowed $1.3 million under various foreign short-term
bank facilities, that are supported by the Revolver which permits borrowings
up to $100.0 million through
September 2010. The average interest rate of such borrowings by foreign subsidiaries
was 8.96% per annum as of November 30, 2005.
| |
Expected Maturity Date |
Total Outstanding
As of November 30, 2005 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Thereafter |
Recorded Value |
Fair Value |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed-rate secured notes, payable in US$ |
$8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 8,333 |
$ 8,640 |
| Average interest rate |
7.92% |
|
|
|
|
|
7.92% |
|
|
| Fixed-rate secured notes, payable in US$ |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
|
40,000 |
40,024 |
| Average interest rate |
5.36% |
5.36% |
5.36% |
5.36% |
|
|
5.36% |
|
|
Fixed-rate secured notes,
payable in Singapore Dollars |
|
|
6,031 |
6,031 |
6,031 |
12,065 |
30,158 |
30,319 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
4.25% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
|
|
Variable-rate bank revolving credit facilities,
payable in local currencies |
|
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
1,251 |
1,251 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
8.96% |
|
8.96% |
|
|
Variable-rate industrial development bonds,
payable in US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
7,200 |
7,200 |
7,200 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% |
3.25% |
|
|
Variable-rate industrial development bonds,
payable in US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
8,500 |
8,500 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% |
3.25% |
|
|
|