CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Ameron International Corporation ("Ameron", the "Company", the “Registrant” or the “Corporation”) is a multinational manufacturer of
highly-engineered products and materials for the chemical, industrial, energy, transportation and infrastructure markets. Ameron is a
leading producer of water transmission lines; fiberglass-composite pipe for transporting oil, chemicals and corrosive fluids and specialized
materials; and products used in infrastructure projects. The Company operates businesses in North America, South America, Europe and
Asia. The Company has three reportable segments. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group manufactures and markets filament-wound and
molded composite fiberglass pipe, tubing, fittings and well screens. The Water Transmission Group manufactures and supplies concrete and
steel pressure pipe, concrete non-pressure pipe,protective linings for pipe and fabricated steel products, such as large-diameter wind towers.
The Infrastructure Products Group consists of two operating segments,which are aggregated: the Hawaii Division which manufactures and
sells ready-mix concrete, sand and aggregates, concrete pipe and culverts and the Pole Products Division which manufactures and sells
concrete and steel lighting and traffic poles. The markets served by the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group are worldwide in scope. The Water
Transmission Group serves primarily the western U.S. for pipe and sells wind towers primarily west of the Mississippi river. The
Infrastructure Products Group's quarry and ready-mix business operates exclusively in Hawaii, and poles are sold throughout the U.S.
Ameron also participates in several joint-venture companies, directly in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, and indirectly in Egypt.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company sold its Performance Coatings & Finishes business ("Coatings Business"). The results from
this segment are reported as discontinued operations for all the reporting periods. Accordingly, the following discussions generally reflect
summary results from continuing operations unless otherwise noted. However, the net income and net income per share discussions
include the impact of discontinued operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources and Results of Operations are based upon the Company's
consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires Management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities during the reporting
periods. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is provided in Note (1) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in
the Company’s 2008 Annual Report. In addition, Management believes the following accounting policies affect the more significant
estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ameron and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany
accounts and transactions are eliminated. The functional currencies for the Company's foreign operations are the applicable local
currencies. The translation from the applicable foreign currencies to U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using current
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted-average exchange rate during the
period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). The Company advances
funds to certain foreign subsidiaries that are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future. Translation adjustments arising from these
advances are also included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). The timing of repayments of intercompany advances could
materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements. Additionally, earnings of foreign subsidiaries are often permanently
reinvested outside the U.S. Unforeseen repatriation of such earnings could result in significant unrecognized U.S. tax liability. Gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in other income, net.
Revenue for the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe and Infrastructure Products segments is recognized when risk of ownership and title pass, primarily at
the time goods are shipped, provided that an agreement exists between the customer and the Company, the price is fixed or determinable and
collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized for the Water Transmission Group primarily under the percentage-of-completion method,
typically based on completed units of production, since products are manufactured under enforceable and binding construction contracts, typically
are designed for specific applications, are not interchangeable between projects, and are not manufactured for stock. Revenue for the period is
determined by multiplying total estimated contract revenue by the percentage-of-completion of the contract and then subtracting the amount of
previously recognized revenue. Cost of earned revenue is computed by multiplying estimated contract completion cost by the percentage-ofcompletion
of the contract and then subtracting the amount of previously recognized cost. In some cases, if products are manufactured for stock
or are not related to specific construction contracts, revenue is recognized under the same criteria used by the other two segments. Revenue under
the percentage-of-completion method is subject to a greater level of estimation, which affects the timing of revenue recognition, costs and profits. Estimates are reviewed on a consistent basis and are adjusted periodically to reflect current expectations. Costs attributable to unpriced change
orders are treated as costs of contract performance in the period, and contract revenue is recognized if recovery is probable. Disputed or
unapproved change orders are treated as claims. Recognition of amounts of additional contract revenue relating to claims occurs when amounts
have been received or awarded with recognition based on the percentage-of-completion methodology.
The Company expenses environmental clean-up costs related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations on a site-by-site basis.
Liabilities and costs associated with these matters, as well as other pending litigation and asserted claims arising in the ordinary course of business,
require estimates of future costs and judgments based on the knowledge and experience of Management and its legal counsel. When the Company's
exposures can be reasonably estimated and are probable, liabilities and expenses are recorded. The ultimate resolution of any such exposure to the
Company may differ due to subsequent developments.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. Certain steel
inventories used by the Water Transmission Group are valued using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. Significant changes in steel levels
or costs could materially impact the Company's financial statements. Reserves are established for excess, obsolete and rework inventories
based on estimates of salability and forecasted future demand. Management records an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based
on historical experience and expected trends. A significant reduction in demand or a significant worsening of customer credit quality could
materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures or affiliates ("joint ventures") over which the Company has significant influence are accounted
for under the equity method of accounting, whereby the investment is carried at the cost of acquisition, plus the Company's equity in
undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition. Investments in joint ventures over which the Company does not have the ability to exert
significant influence over the investees' operating and financing activities are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. The
Company's investment in TAMCO, a steel mini-mill in California, is accounted for under the equity method. Investments in Ameron Saudi
Arabia, Ltd. and Bondstrand, Ltd. are accounted for under the cost method due to Management's current assessment of the Company's
influence over these joint ventures.
Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost and depreciated principally using a straight-line method based on the estimated
useful lives of the related assets, generally three to 40 years. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If the estimated future, undiscounted cash
flows from the use of an asset are less than its carrying value, a write-down is recorded to reduce the related asset to estimated fair value.
Actual cash flows may differ significantly from estimated cash flows. Additionally, current estimates of future cash flows may differ from
subsequent estimates of future cash flows. Changes in estimated or actual cash flows could materially impact the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
The Company is self-insured for a portion of the losses and liabilities primarily associated with workers' compensation claims and general,
product and vehicle liability. Losses are accrued based upon the Company's estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using
historical experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The estimate of self-insurance liability includes
an estimate of incurred but not reported claims, based on data compiled from historical experience. Actual experience could differ
significantly from these estimates and could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company purchases
varying levels of insurance to cover losses in excess of the self-insured limits. Currently, the Company's primary self-insurance limits or
deductibles are $1.0 million per workers' compensation claim, $.1 million per general, property or product liability claim, and $.25 million
per vehicle liability claim.
The Company follows the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” SFAS No. 87, “Employers' Accounting for Pensions,” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” when accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits. Under these
accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets that are
controlled and invested by third-party fiduciaries. Delayed recognition of differences between actual results and expected or estimated
results is a guiding principle of these standards. Such delayed recognition provides a gradual recognition of benefit obligations and
investment performance over the working lives of the employees who benefit under the plans, based on various assumptions. Assumed
discount rates are used to calculate the present values of benefit payments which are projected to be made in the future, including
projections of increases in employees' annual compensation and health care costs. Management also projects the future returns on invested
assets based principally on prior performance. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs the Company records in the current
period. Actual results could vary significantly from projected results, and such deviations could materially impact the Company's
consolidated financial statements. Management consults with the Company’s actuaries when determining these assumptions. Program
changes, including termination, freezing of benefits or acceleration of benefits, could result in an immediate recognition of unrecognized
benefit obligations; and such recognition could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The discount rate is based on market interest rates. At November 30, 2008, the Company increased the annual discount rate from 6.15% to
7.29% as a result of the then-current market interest rates on long-term, fixed-income debt securities of highly-rated corporations. In
estimating the expected return on assets, the Company considers past performance and future expectations for various types of investments
as well as the expected long-term allocation of assets.At November 30, 2008, the Company decreased the long-term annual rate of return on
assets assumption from 8.75% to 8.50% to reflect current expectations for future returns in the equity markets. In projecting the rate of
increase in compensation levels, the Company considers movements in inflation rates as reflected by market interest rates.At November 30,
2008, the Company changed the assumed annual rate of compensation increase from 3.65% to 4.25%. In selecting the rate of increase in
health care costs, the Company considers past performance and forecasts of future health care cost trends. At November 30, 2008, the
Company decreased the annual rate of increase in health care costs from 10% to 9%, decreasing ratably until reaching 5% in 2012 and
beyond.
Different assumptions would impact the Company’s projected benefit obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs related to pensions,
and the accrued other benefit obligations and benefit costs related to postretirement benefits. The following reflects the impact associated
with a change in certain assumptions (in thousands):
| |
1% Increase |
1% Decrease |
| |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Costs |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Obligations |
Increase/(Decrease) in Benefit Costs |
Discount Rate:
Pensions |
$ (21,263) |
$ (866) |
$23,697 |
$ 2,517 |
Discount Rate:
Other postretirement benefits |
(263) |
(23) |
304 |
23 |
| Expected rate of return on assets |
Not Applicable |
(2,139) |
Not Applicable |
2,139 |
| Rate of increase in compensation levels |
2,248 |
628 |
(2,035) |
(562) |
| Rate of increase in health care costs |
120 |
16 |
(106) |
(15) |
Additional information regarding pensions and other postretirement benefits is disclosed in Note (16) of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report.
Effective December 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements,”which provides a framework for measuring fair
value. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that the
Company believes market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in
the inputs to valuation techniques. These inputs can be readily observable,market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company
primarily applies the market and income approaches for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available
information. Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The ultimate exit price could
be significantly different than currently estimated by the Company.
Management incentive compensation is accrued based on current estimates of the Company's ability to achieve short-term and long-term
performance targets. The Company’s actual performance could be significantly different than currently estimated by the Company.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which
the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the
amounts expected to be realized. Quarterly income taxes are estimated based on the mix of income by jurisdiction forecasted for the full
fiscal year. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for tax-related matters. Actual income, the mix of income by jurisdiction
and income taxes could be significantly different than currently estimated.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The Company’s
estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to Management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time, pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No. 48 requires a more-likely-than-not
threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. A liability is
recorded for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured pursuant to FIN No. 48 and the tax position taken or expected to
be taken on the tax return. To the extent that the Company’s assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded
in the period in which the determination is made. The Company reports tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax
expense.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following discussion of liquidity and capital resources combines the impact of both continuing and discontinued operations unless otherwise
noted.
As of November 30, 2008, the Company's working capital, including cash and cash equivalents and current portion of long-term debt, totaled $297.4
million, a decrease of $16.9 million from working capital of $314.3 million as of November 30, 2007. The decrease resulted primarily from a
decrease in cash, receivables, inventories, other prepaid assets, income taxes payable and deferred income, partially offset by an increase in trade
payables. The reductions in receivables and inventories were primarily due to more efficient working capital management. All of the Company's
industry segments turned inventory between four and six times per year in 2008, compared to four and seven times in 2007. Average days' sales in
accounts receivable ranged between 36 and 131 in 2008, compared to 33 and 171 times in 2007, for all segments. Cash and cash equivalents totaled
$143.6 million as of November 30, 2008, compared to $155.4 million as of November 30, 2007.
In accordance with SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows,” the consolidated statements of cash flows include cash flows for both continuing and
discontinued operations. During 2008, net cash of $88.4 million was generated from operating activities, compared to $63.2 million generated in
2007. The higher operating cash flow in 2008 was primarily due to lower growth in operating assets, offset by lower liabilities and earnings. In
2007, the Company's cash from operating activities included net income of $67.2 million, less loss on sale of assets and gain from sale of
discontinued operations of $5.9 million, plus non-cash adjustments (depreciation,amortization, deferred taxes, dividends from joint-ventures less
than equity income and stock compensation expense) of $28.3 million,offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $26.4 million. In 2008,
the Company's cash provided by operating activities included net income of $58.6 million, plus loss on sale of assets of $.1 million, plus similar
non-cash adjustments of $22.3 million, plus corresponding changes in operating assets and liabilities of $7.4 million. The higher operating cash flow in 2007, compared to 2006, was primarily due to higher earnings and lower growth in operating assets and liabilities. In 2006, $16.8 million
of cash was generated from operating activities. Cash from operating activities included net income of $52.2 million, less gain on sale of assets and
loss from sale of discontinued operations of $8.7 million, plus similar non-cash adjustments of $14.8 million, offset by changes in operating assets
and liabilities of $41.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $59.1 million in 2008, compared to $37.1 million in 2007. In 2008, the Company generated net proceeds
of $1.6 million from the sale of assets. In 2007, the Company generated net proceeds of $16.6 million from the sale of assets, including the sale of
certain properties used by the former Coatings Business. In 2006, the Company generated net proceeds of $10.3 million from the sale of assets. In
addition, the Company generated proceeds of $115.0 million from the sale of the Coatings Business in 2006. Net cash used in investing activities
included capital expenditures of $60.7 million in 2008, compared to $47.7 million in 2007. In addition to capital expenditures for normal
replacement and upgrades of machinery and equipment, in both 2007 and 2008, the Company spent $22.1 million and $13.7 million, respectively,
to enhance the capabilities of its steel fabrication plant in California to manufacture large-diameter wind towers. The Company also spent $9.2
million for the construction of a new fiberglass pipe plant in Brazil in 2008. Additionally, the Company acquired the business of Polyplaster, Ltda.
(“Polyplaster”), a Brazilian fiberglass-pipe operation, in 2007 for approximately $6.0 million, plus an earn out that could total $1.5 million based
on the post-acquisition performance of the acquired business. In 2006, net cash used in investing activities included capital expenditures of $34.5
million. Additionally, the assets of a Mexican steel fabrication operation were acquired for approximately $1.0 million in 2006. During the year
ending November 30, 2009, the Company anticipates spending between $30 and $40 million on capital expenditures. Normal replacement
expenditures are typically equal to depreciation. In addition, the Company anticipates that it will fund from $10 million to $35 million to support
the operations and capital expenditures of TAMCO. Capital expenditures and investments are expected to be funded by existing cash balances, cash
generated from operations or additional borrowings.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $32.5 million during 2008, compared to $16.5 million in 2007. Net cash used in 2008 consisted of net
payment of debt of $21.1 million, payment of Common Stock dividends of $10.5 million and treasury stock purchases of $2.6 million, related to
the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of restricted shares.Also in 2008, the Company received $.4 million from the issuance of Common
Stock related to exercised stock options and recognized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $1.3 million. Net cash used in 2007
consisted of net payment of debt of $10.2 million, payment of Common Stock dividends of $8.2 million and similar treasury stock purchases of
$1.6 million. In 2007, the Company received $1.6 million from the issuance of Common Stock related to exercised stock options and recognized
tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $2.0 million. In 2006, $14.0 million was used in financing activities. Cash used in 2006
consisted of net payment of debt of $16.1 million, payment of Common Stock dividends of $7.1 million and similar treasury stock purchases of
$1.2 million. In 2006, the Company received $8.0 million from issuance of Common Stock related to the exercise of stock options and recognized
tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $2.5 million.
The Company utilizes a $100.0 million revolving credit facility with six banks (the "Revolver"). Under the Revolver, the Company may, at its option,
borrow at floating interest rates (LIBOR plus a spread ranging from .75% to 1.625%, determined based on the Company’s financial condition and
performance), at any time until September 2010, when all borrowings under the Revolver must be repaid.
The Company's lending agreements contain various restrictive covenants, including the requirement to maintain specified amounts of net worth
and restrictions on cash dividends, borrowings, liens, investments, guarantees, and financial covenants. The Company is required to maintain
consolidated net worth of $181.4 million plus 50% of net income and 75% of proceeds from any equity issued after January 24, 2003. The
Company's consolidated net worth exceeded the covenant amount by $167.9 million as of November 30, 2008.The Company is required to maintain
a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") of
no more than 2.5 times.At November 30, 2008, the Company maintained a consolidated leverage ratio of .54 times EBITDA. Lending agreements
require that the Company maintain qualified consolidated tangible assets at least equal to the outstanding secured funded indebtedness. At
November 30, 2008, qualifying tangible assets equaled 4.15 times funded indebtedness.Under the most restrictive fixed charge coverage ratio, the
sum of EBITDA and rental expense less cash taxes must be at least 1.50 times the sum of interest expense, rental expense, dividends and scheduled
funded debt payments.At November 30, 2008, the Company maintained such a fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.68 times. Under the most restrictive
provisions of the Company's lending agreements, approximately $26.8 million of retained earnings was not restricted at November 30, 2008, as to
the declaration of cash dividends or the repurchase of Company stock. At November 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
Cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2008 totaled $143.6 million, a decrease of $11.9 million from November 30, 2007. At November 30, 2008,
the Company had total debt outstanding of $52.8 million, compared to $74.6 million at November 30, 2007, and approximately $112.2 million in
unused committed and uncommitted credit lines available from foreign and domestic banks. The Company's highest borrowing and the average
borrowing levels during 2008 were $74.5 million and $71.1 million, respectively.
Cash balances are held throughout the world, including substantial amounts held outside of the U.S. Most of the amounts held outside of the U.S.
could be repatriated to the U.S. but, under current law,would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits.
The Company contributed $3.0 million to the U.S. defined-benefit pension plan and $.9 million to the non-U.S. defined-benefit pension plans in
2008. The Company expects to contribute approximately $8.5 million to its U.S. defined-benefit pension plan and $1.8 million to the non-U.S.
defined-benefit pension plans in 2009. The increased contribution is due to the decrease in plan assets associated with declining investment
markets in 2008 and to the funding requirement of the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
TAMCO’s primary source of financing is a $60 million credit facility.Approximately $50 million is currently outstanding under the credit facility,
which is scheduled to expire on March 1, 2009.TAMCO has received a commitment from its bank, subject to certain conditions precedent to closing,
for a one year credit facility that decreases to $35 million effective May 1, 2009. Separately, TAMCO’s shareholders agreed to provide $22 million to
TAMCO by February 28, 2009. The Company’s share of the funding from shareholders totals $11 million. The Company may provide additional
funding to TAMCO if TAMCO is unable to finalize the bank facility or obtain other third-party financing. TAMCO's ability to issue dividends will
be dependent on its future cash position and limited by terms of its financing arrangements.
Management believes that cash flow from operations and current cash balances, together with currently available lines of credit, will be sufficient
to meet operating requirements in 2009. Cash available from operations could be affected by any general economic downturn or any decline or
adverse changes in the Company's business, such as a loss of customers, competitive pricing pressures or significant raw material price increases.
The Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments at November 30, 2008 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period |
| Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Long-Term Debt |
$ 52,752 |
$ 16,763 |
$ 13,526 |
$ 6,763 |
$ 15,700 |
| Interest payments on debt (a) |
5,493 |
1,891 |
1,849 |
701 |
1,052 |
| Operating Leases |
36,255 |
4,494 |
7,345 |
3,534 |
20,882 |
| Pension funding |
10,300 |
10,300 |
|
|
|
| Purchase obligations (b) |
235 |
235 |
|
|
|
| Uncertain tax positions |
1,127 |
1,127 |
|
|
|
| Total Contractual Obligations (c) |
$ 106,162 |
$ 34,810 |
$ 22,720 |
$ 10,998 |
$ 37,634 |
| |
| Commitments Expiring Per Period |
| Commercial Commitments |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
5+ Years |
| Standby Letters of Credit (e) |
$ 2,100 |
$ 2,100 |
— |
— |
— |
| Total Commercial Commitments (d) |
$ 2,100 |
$ 2,100 |
— |
— |
— |
(a) Future interest payments related to debt obligations, excluding the Revolver.
(b) Obligation to purchase sand used in the Company's ready-mix operations in Hawaii.
(c) The Company has no capitalized lease obligations, unconditional purchase obligations or standby repurchases obligations.
(d) Not included are standby letters of credit totaling $16,067 supporting industrial development bonds with principal of $15,700. The
principal amount of the industrial development bonds is included in long-term debt. The standby letters of credit are issued under the
Revolver
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2007 COMPARED WITH 2006
General
Income from continuing operations totaled $58.6 million,or $6.39 per diluted share,on sales of $667.5 million in the year ended November 30, 2008,
compared to $61.1 million, or $6.73 per diluted share, on sales of $631.0 million in 2007. Income from continuing operations was lower in 2008 due
principally to $5.3 million of tax benefits recognized in 2007 associated with the dissolution of the Company’s wholly-owned United Kingdom
subsidiary. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group had higher sales and income due to continued strength in energy and marine markets and the
acquisition of the business of Polyplaster. The Water Transmission Group had higher sales primarily due to wind towers and larger losses due to
the weak pipe market and inefficient pipe and wind tower production. The Infrastructure Products Group had lower sales and income due to
declines by both the Hawaii division and the Pole Products division due to declining construction markets. Equity in earnings of TAMCO,Ameron's
50%-owned steel mini-mill in California, decreased by $5.0 million in 2008, compared to 2007, due to the decline in the steel market.
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, totaled $6.1 million, or $.67 per diluted share, in 2007. In 2007, the Company completed
disposition of several retained properties formerly used by the Coatings Business and recognized a net gain of $5.3 million. Also in 2007, the
Company recognized a net gain of $.1 million from the final settlement of the sale of the Coatings Business, $.2 million of research and development
credits and $.7 million of tax benefits.
Sales
Sales increased $36.5 million in 2008, compared to 2007. Sales increased due to higher demand for fiberglass piping, the impact of foreign
exchange rates on the Company’s Asian and European operations and expansion of the Company’s capabilities to manufacture largediameter
wind towers, offset by lower sales into weak residential construction markets.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $36.3 million, or 15.3%, in 2008, compared to 2007. Sales from operations in the U.S. increased
$10.2 million in 2008 primarily due to increase demand for onshore oilfield piping which more than offset a decline in demand for industrial
piping. Sales from Asian subsidiary operations increased $22.8 million in 2008, driven by activity in the industrial, marine and offshore
segments and the impact of foreign exchange. Sales from European operations decreased $12.2 million in 2008 primarily due to a decline
in onshore oilfield and industrial piping, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange. The Brazilian business acquired at the end of 2007
contributed sales of $16.8 million in 2008, compared to $1.3 million in 2007. The strong demand for onshore oilfield, offshore, industrial
and marine piping continued to be driven by high oil prices and the high cost of steel piping, the principal substitute for fiberglass pipe,
during most of the year. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group began 2009 with a record order backlog which should support the beginning
of 2009. However, the Group’s customers in the marine, offshore and onshore oilfield markets could be at risk given the decline in oil prices,
financing issues, lower transportation demand and shipping rates. While the business has not been impacted to date, oil-price volatility and
general economic conditions are expected to impact the Group in 2009.
Water Transmission’s sales increased $25.0 million, or 13.2%, in 2008, compared to 2007. The sales increase was driven by the Company’s
expansion into the market for large-diameter wind towers and by its operation in South America, which benefited from increased demand
for water pipe in Colombia. Sales of water pipe into domestic markets were slightly higher. Sales of wind towers increased $19.7 million, or
42%, in 2008, compared to 2007. The water infrastructure market in the western U.S., including California, Arizona and Nevada, remains
weak, with bid activity in some markets at the lowest levels in recent history. The slow market is being adversely affected by a number of
factors including the normal cycle for large diameter,high pressure water transmission pipelines, governmental budget problems and overall
project costs. The fundamental long-term factors that drive the market are demographics, population growth and the need for new and
upgraded water infrastructure to provide adequate and reliable supplies. There are numerous projects that are in the planning and design
stages that address the water infrastructure requirements of the region. These projects should eventually proceed; however, the timing of
orders is uncertain. The order backlog for water pipe at November 30, 2008 totaled $62.3 million, a level which reflects the lack of recent bid
activity and represents an unusually low backlog for the business. The wind tower order backlog at November 30, 2008 totaled $91 million;
however, a portion of the backlog may be postponed due to current market conditions. The level of new wind tower orders recently declined
due to lack of project financing.
Infrastructure Products' sales decreased $26.7 million, or 13.0%, in 2008, compared to 2007. The Company’s Hawaiian division had lower
sales as construction markets in Hawaii began to weaken. Pole Products was impacted by the decline in U.S. housing markets and reduced
demand for concrete lighting poles. The Infrastructure Products Group is expected to continue to be impacted by the slowdown in
construction spending in Hawaii and the low residential construction spending level in the western and the southeastern U.S.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2008 was $153.6 million, or 23.0% of sales, compared to $146.0 million, or 23.1% of sales, in 2007. Gross profit increased $7.6
million due to higher sales, as the negative impact of production inefficiencies in 2008 was offset in large part by lower LIFO reserves than
in 2007. The gross profit margin decrease related to under utilization of pole production, competitive pricing pressures caused by soft
market conditions and inefficient production by the Water Transmission Group, substantially offset by the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
Group’s profit margin improvement.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $22.5 million in 2008, compared to 2007. Profit margins improved to 39.5% in
2008, compared to 36.0% in 2007. Higher margins resulted from improvements in product and market mix, price increases and improved
plant utilization. Increased sales, from higher volume and prices, generated additional gross profit of $13.1 million, while favorable product
mix and operating efficiencies generated additional gross profit of $9.4 million in 2008.
Water Transmission Group's gross profit decreased $10.1 million in 2008, compared to 2007. Profit margins declined to 1.8% in 2008,
compared to 7.3% in 2007. Higher sales increased profit by $1.8 million in 2008. Lower margins reduced gross profit by $11.9 million due
to an unfavorable mix of projects, start-up costs associated with the expansion into wind towers, underutilization of plant capacity,
production inefficiencies and pricing pressures due to market conditions.
Gross profit in the Infrastructure Products Group decreased $12.4 million in 2008, compared to 2007. Profit margins declined to 21.9% in
2008, compared to 25.1% in 2007. Lower sales reduced gross profit by $6.7 million, while unfavorable plant utilization and pricing pressures
due to market conditions lowered gross profit by $5.7 million in 2008.
Consolidated gross profit was $5.5 million higher in 2008 than in 2007 due to decreased reserves in 2008 associated with LIFO accounting
of certain steel inventories used by the Water Transmission Group. LIFO reserves are not allocated to the operating segments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses totaled $98.2 million, or 14.7% of sales, in 2008, compared to $97.9 million, or 15.5%
of sales, in 2007. The $.3 million increase in SG&A included $3.5 million from Polyplaster and other Brazilian operations, higher stock
compensation expense of $2.2 million and higher insurance expense of $1.4 million, offset by lower pension expense of $3.9 million,
primarily due to improved funding of the pension plans, lower management incentive compensation of $1.5 million and lower auditing and
consulting fees of $1.4 million. The reduction in SG&A as a percent of sales was due to spending controls and the leverage achieved from
higher sales.
Other Income, Net
Other income was $8.2 million in 2008, compared to $6.0 million in 2007. The increase in other income in 2008 was due primarily to $1.5
million higher dividend income from affiliates and $2.7 million proceeds from insurance reimbursements, offset by $1.4 million of foreign
exchange loss and $.6 million lower miscellaneous income. Other income also included royalties and fees from licensees, foreign currency
transaction losses and other miscellaneous income.
Interest
Net interest income totaled $1.5 million in 2008, compared to net interest income of $1.9 million in 2007. Net interest income was lower due
to lower interest on short-term investments due to lower overall interest rates, partially offset by lower outstanding debt during 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to $17.0 million in 2008, from $10.4 million in 2007. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations
increased to 26.0% in 2008, from 18.5% in 2007. The effective tax rate in 2008 was reduced by tax benefits of $2.9 million associated with
tax years no longer subject to audit and settlement of the 2005-2006 Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examinations. The effective tax rate
in 2007 was reduced by tax benefits of $5.3 million associated with the decision to dissolve the Company’s wholly-owned United Kingdom
subsidiary. Income from certain foreign operations and joint ventures is taxed at rates that are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates. For
both 2007 and 2008, the Company provided a full valuation allowance for the net operating loss carry-overs of its foreign subsidiaries except
its subsidiary in the Netherlands. The Company released $1.1 million in 2008 and $3.2 million in 2007 of valuation allowance for deferred
tax assets related to the Netherlands subsidiary due to profitability in 2008 and 2007 and projected future profitability.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity income,which consists of Ameron’s share of the net income of TAMCO,decreased to $10.3 million in 2008, compared to $15.4 million
in 2007. Ameron owns 50% of TAMCO, a mini-mill that produces steel rebar for the construction industry in the western U.S. Equity income
is shown net of income taxes. Dividends from TAMCO were taxed at an effective rate of 9.6% in 2008 and 9.6% in 2007, reflecting the
dividend exclusion provided to the Company under current tax laws. The decline in TAMCO’s earnings occurred late in 2008 and was due
to the difficult conditions in the steel market. TAMCO’s fourth-quarter results included a $9.8 million write-down of inventory to the lower
of cost or market as a result of the recent reduction in steel rebar selling prices. Demand for steel rebar in TAMCO’s key markets in Nevada,
California and Arizona is not expected to recover in the short term.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
Income from discontinued operations totaled $6.1 million in 2007. In 2007, the Company completed disposition of several retained
properties formerly used by the Coatings Business and recognized a net gain of $5.3 million. In 2007, the Company recognized a net gain
of $.1 million from the final settlement of the sale of the Coatings Business. In addition, in 2007 the Company recognized $.2 million of
research and development tax credits related to the retroactive application of tax legislation and $.6 million of net tax benefit due to an
adjustment in tax expense related to the gain on sale of the business.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2006 COMPARED WITH 2005
General
Income from continuing operations totaled $61.1 million, or $6.73 per diluted share, on sales of $631.0 million for the year ended November
30, 2007, compared to $50.1 million, or $5.64 per diluted share, on sales of $549.2 million in 2006. All segments had higher sales, and all
segments had higher profits due to generally-improved market conditions, except the Water Transmission Group. Income from continuing
operations was higher due primarily to sales growth, interest income,higher equity income and a lower effective tax rate. Equity in earnings
of TAMCO increased by $1.8 million in 2007, compared to 2006.
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, totaled $6.1 million, or $.67 per diluted share, in 2007, compared to $2.1 million, or $.24
per diluted share, in 2006.
The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group achieved record sales and profits in 2007 as a result of continued strong demand in the oilfield,
industrial and marine piping markets worldwide. The Infrastructure Products Group had higher sales and profits due to the strong
construction sector in Hawaii,which more than offset a decline in sales and profits from the Pole Products Division. The Water Transmission
Group reported higher sales but a loss due to the timing of water pipe projects and the start-up costs and delays in the construction of a new
wind tower manufacturing facility.
Sales
Sales increased $81.8 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Sales increased due to higher demand for marine piping, the impact of foreign
exchange rates on the Company’s Asian and European operations and higher demand for construction materials in Hawaii due to the
continued strength in governmental and commercial construction spending.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $61.1 million, or 34.6%, in 2007, compared to 2006. Sales from operations in the U.S. increased
$6.9 million in 2007 primarily due to increased demand for industrial piping, which offset a decline in demand for onshore oilfield piping.
Sales from Asian subsidiary operations increased $31.6 million in 2007, driven by activity in the industrial,marine and offshore segments
and the impact of foreign exchange. Sales from European operations increased $21.3 million in 2007 due to growth in industrial, oilfield
and marine markets and the impact of foreign exchange. The Brazilian business acquired in October 2007 contributed sales of $1.3 million.
The strong demand for oilfield, industrial and marine piping continued to be driven by high oil prices and the high cost of steel piping, the
principal substitute for fiberglass pipe.
Water Transmission’s sales increased $15.3 million, or 8.7%, in 2007, compared to 2006. The sales increase was driven by the Company’s
entry into the market for large-diameter wind towers and the Group’s operation in South America which benefited from increased demand
for water pipe in Colombia. The demand for large-diameter water pipe in the western U.S. remained soft due to completion of projects and
a cyclical lull in the building of new projects.
Infrastructure Products' sales increased $7.5 million, or 3.8%, in 2007, compared to 2006. The Company’s Hawaiian division had higher
sales due to improved pricing and the continued strength of the governmental, commercial and residential construction markets on Oahu
and Maui. Pole Products was impacted by the decline in U.S.housing markets and reduced demand for concrete lighting poles. Sales of steel
poles for highway and traffic applications increased.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in 2007 was $146.0 million, or 23.1% of sales, compared to $132.4 million, or 24.1% of sales, in 2006. Gross profit increased
$13.6 million due to higher sales while the gross profit margin declined due to the reduced profitability of the Water Transmission Group.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $26.9 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Profit margins improved to 36.0% in
2007, compared to 33.3% in 2006. Higher margins resulted from improvements in product and market mix, price increases and plant
utilization. Increased sales volume and prices generated additional gross profit of $20.3 million, while favorable product mix and operating
efficiencies generated additional gross profit of $6.6 million in 2007.
Water Transmission Group's gross profit decreased $12.4 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Profit margins declined to 7.3% in 2007,
compared to 15.0% in 2006. Higher sales volume increased profit by $2.3 million in 2007. Lower margins negatively impacted gross profit
by $14.7 million due to an unfavorable mix of projects, start-up costs associated with the introduction of wind towers and lower efficiencies
due to lower pipe sales and the delay in construction of the wind tower plant.
Gross profit in the Infrastructure Products Group increased $4.6 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Profit margins improved to 25.1% in
2007, compared to 23.7% in 2006. Increased sales volume and prices generated additional gross profit of $1.8 million, while higher margins
generated additional gross profit of $2.8 million for 2007. Higher margins resulted from price increases and operating efficiencies due to
increased production levels in Hawaii.
Additionally, consolidated gross profit was $5.5 million lower in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due primarily to increased
reserves in 2007 associated with LIFO accounting of certain steel inventories used by the Water Transmission Group.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses totaled $97.9 million, or 15.5% of sales, in 2007, compared to $94.7 million, or 17.2% of sales, in 2006. The $3.2 million increase
included higher legal fees and claims of $3.1 million, self-insurance reserves of $1.4 million, stock compensation expense of $.6 million, and
commissions and administrative expense of $1.9 million associated with higher sales, offset by lower pension expense of $3.8 million primarily due
to the sale of the Coatings Business and improved funding of the pension plans. The reduction in SG&A as a percent of sales was due to spending
controls and the leverage achieved from higher sales.
Other
Income, Net
Other income was $6.0 million in 2007, compared to $11.4 million in 2006. The decrease in other income in 2007 was due primarily to a
$9.0 million gain from the sale of property in Brea, California in 2006. Other income also included royalties and fees from licensees, foreign
currency transaction losses, and other miscellaneous income.
Interest
Net interest income totaled $1.9 million in 2007, compared to net interest expense of $1.7 million in 2006. Net interest income was due to
higher interest income from short-term investments, lower average outstanding debt and less higher-rate, fixed-rate debt than in 2006.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased to $10.4 million in 2007, from $10.9 million in 2006. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations
decreased to 18.5% in 2007, from 23.0% in 2006. The effective tax rate in 2007 was reduced by tax benefits of $5.3 million associated with
the decision to dissolve the Company’s wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary. The effective tax in 2006 was reduced by tax benefits of
$7.2 million primarily as a result of settlements of the 1996–1998 and 1999–2002 IRS examinations and approval of the Company's research
and development credit refund claims by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. For both 2006 and 2007, the Company provided
a full valuation allowance for the net operating loss carry-overs of its foreign subsidiaries except its subsidiary in the Netherlands. In 2007,
the Company released $3.2 million of valuation allowance related to this subsidiary due to profitability in 2007 and a change in projected profitability in the future.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recognized a charge to income from continuing operations of
approximately $1.2 million primarily related to an additional valuation allowance for deferred tax assets associated with the Company’s
subsidiary in the Netherlands.
Equity in Earnings of Joint Venture, Net of Taxes
Equity income,which consists of Ameron’s share of the net income of TAMCO, increased to $15.4 million in 2007, compared to $13.6 million
in 2006. Dividends from TAMCO were taxed at an effective rate of 9.6% in 2007 and 11.3% in 2006 reflecting the dividend exclusion provided
to the Company under current tax laws. The improvement in TAMCO’s earnings was due to increased demand for steel rebar and higher
selling prices, reflecting the continued strong construction market and the high price of steel worldwide.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
Income from discontinued operations totaled $6.1 million in 2007, compared to $2.1 million, in 2006. In 2007, the Company completed
disposition of several retained properties formerly used by the Coatings Business and recognized a net gain of $5.3 million. In 2007, the
Company recognized a net gain of $.1 million from the final settlement of the sale of the Coatings Business. In addition, the Company
recognized $.2 million of research and development tax credits related to the retroactive application of tax legislation enacted in December
2006 and $.6 million of net tax benefit due to an adjustment in tax expense related to the gain on sale of the business. In 2006, the Company
completed the sale of the Coatings Business, subject to final settlement of certain disputed items which were resolved in 2007, and
recognized a pretax gain of $.9 million. Provision for income taxes related to the gain was $1.0 million, which resulted in a net loss on the
sale of $.2 million in 2006. Income from discontinued operations before the loss on the sale of the Coatings Business, net of taxes, totaled
$2.3 million for the year ended November 30, 2006. The Coatings Business generated $152.2 million of net sales in 2006.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing, other than listed in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section herein.All of the
Company's subsidiaries are included in the financial statements,and the Company does not have relationships with any special purpose entities.
CONTINGENCIES
In April 2004, Sable Offshore Energy Inc. ("Sable"), as agent for certain owners of the Sable Offshore Energy Project, brought an action
against various coatings suppliers and application contractors, including the Company and two of its subsidiaries, Ameron (UK) Limited
and Ameron B.V. (collectively the "Ameron Subsidiaries"), in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada. Sable seeks damages allegedly
sustained by it resulting from performance problems with several coating systems used on the Sable Offshore Energy Project, including
coatings products furnished by the Company and the Ameron Subsidiaries. Sable's originating notice and statement of claim alleged a claim
for damages in an unspecified amount; however, Sable has since alleged that its claim for damages against all defendants is approximately
440 million Canadian dollars, a figure which the Company and the Ameron Subsidiaries contest. This matter is in discovery, and no trial
date has yet been established. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this
time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In May 2003, Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (collectively "Dominion") brought an
action against the Company in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana as owners of an offshore production facility known
as a SPAR. Dominion seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from delays in delivery of the SPAR caused by the removal and
replacement of certain coatings containing lead and/or lead chromate for which the manufacturer of the SPAR alleged the Company was
responsible. Dominion contends that the Company made certain misrepresentations and warranties to Dominion concerning the lead-free
nature of those coatings. Dominion's petition as filed alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified amount; however,Dominion's economic
expert has since estimated Dominion's damages at approximately $128 million, a figure which the Company contests. This matter is in
discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information
available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In July 2004, BP America Production Company (“BP America”) brought an action against the Company in the 24th Judicial District Court,
Parish of Jefferson, Louisiana in connection with fiberglass pipe sold by the Company for installation in four offshore platforms constructed
for BP America. The plaintiff seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from claimed defects in such pipe. BP America’s petition as
filed alleged a claim against the Company for rescission, products liability, negligence, breach of contract and warranty and for damages in
an amount of not less than $20 million, a figure which the Company contests. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been
established. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company
is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In June 2006, the Cawelo, California Water District (“Cawelo”) brought an action against the Company in Kern County Superior Court,
California in connection with concrete pipe sold by the Company in 1995 for a wastewater recovery pipeline in such county. Cawelo seeks
damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from the failure of such pipe in 2004. Cawelo’s petition as filed alleged a claim against the
Company for products liability, negligence, breach of express warranty and breach of written contract and for damages in an amount of not
less than $8 million, a figure which the Company contests. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. The
Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to
estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
The Company is a defendant in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for
asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by the Company and others. As of November 30,
2008, the Company was a defendant in 24 asbestos-related cases, compared to 36 cases (60 claimants) as of November 30, 2007. During the
year ended November 30, 2008, there were 20 new asbestos-related cases, 24 cases dismissed, eight cases settled, no judgments and
aggregate net costs and expenses of $.1 million. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate
the possible range of loss with respect to these cases.
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the environment and is currently participating in
administrative proceedings at several sites under these laws.While the Company finds it difficult to estimate with any certainty the total cost
of remediation at the several sites, on the basis of currently available information and reserves provided, the Company believes that the
outcome of such environmental regulatory proceedings will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations. During the year ended November 30, 2008, the Company incurred $1.0 million of net costs and expenses related to
such proceedings.
The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) sent to the Company a Requirement To Furnish Information
regarding transactions involving Iran. The Company intends to cooperate fully with OFAC on this matter. Based upon the information
available to it at this time, the Company is not able to predict the outcome of this matter.
In addition, certain other claims, suits and complaints that arise in the ordinary course of business, have been filed or are pending against
the Company. Management believes that these matters are either adequately reserved, covered by insurance, or would not have a material
effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations if disposed of unfavorably.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No.
48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109 and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
on a tax return. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN No. 48 as a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination
by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized
upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 must be applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption. The cumulative effect of applying FIN
No. 48 at adoption is to be reported as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings for the year of adoption. FIN No. 48 was effective for the
first quarter of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year. Prior to December 1, 2007, the Company recorded reserves related to uncertain tax positions as
a current liability. Upon adoption of FIN No. 48, the Company reclassified tax reserves related to uncertain tax positions for which a cash
payment was not expected within the next 12 months to noncurrent liabilities. The Company’s adoption of FIN No. 48 did not require a
cumulative adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Relative to SFAS No. 157, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(“FSP”) FASB Statements (“FAS”) 157-1, FAS 157-2 and FAS 157-3 in 2008. FSP FAS 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13,
“Accounting for Leases,” and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions. FSP FAS 157-2 delays the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except
those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies how SFAS No. 157
should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, as amended, effective December
1, 2007 with the exception of the application of SFAS No. 157 to non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results of operations or financial position.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,”
amending FASB Statement No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” FASB Statement No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits,” FASB Statement No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” and FASB Statement No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits.” SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other
than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its financial statements and to recognize changes in that status in the year in which the
changes occur. SFAS No. 158 also requires a company to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end financial statements.
The Company adopted the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158 in 2008. See Note (16) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in
the Company’s 2008 Annual Report, for information regarding the impact of adopting the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158.The Company
has not yet adopted the measurement provisions which are not effective until 2009. The Company is evaluating whether the adoption of the
measurement provision of SFAS No. 158 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. EITF Issue No. 06-4 requires that, for split-dollar life insurance arrangements providing a benefit to an employee extending to
postretirement periods, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106,“Employers’Accounting For
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” EITF Issue No. 06-4 requires that recognition of the effects of adoption should be either by (a) a
change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption or (b) a
change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-4 is not expected to
have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt EITF Issue No. 06-4 in the first quarter of
the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS No. 159 allows an
entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a
contract-by-contract basis. SFAS No. 159 also provides companies the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 was adopted by
the Company as of December 1, 2007. The Company irrevocably elected not to exercise the fair value option. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did
not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 06-11,“Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards,”effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. EITF Issue No. 06–11 requires on a prospective basis that the tax benefit related to dividend
equivalents paid on restricted stock and restricted stock units which are expected to vest,be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-11 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company
will adopt EITF Issue No. 06-11 in the first quarter of the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) amends accounting and reporting standards
associated with business combinations and requires the acquiring entity to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling
interests in the acquired entity at the date of acquisition at their fair values. In addition, SFAS No. 141(R) requires that direct costs associated
with an acquisition be expensed as incurred and sets forth various other changes in accounting and reporting related to business combinations.
SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply SFAS No. 141(R) before that date. The first such reporting
period for the Company will be the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No.
51.” SFAS No. 160 amends the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests in a consolidated subsidiary and the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Included in this statement is the requirement that noncontrolling interests be reported in the equity section of the balance sheet.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption
is prohibited. The first such reporting period for the Company will be the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2009.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133,” effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about how and why
the Company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect the Company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS No.
161 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 161 in the
first quarter of the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities,” which addresses whether unvested instruments granted in share-based payment transactions that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities subject to the two-class method of computing earnings
per share under SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 is
not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Consideration,” effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. EITF Issue No. 08-6 requires an equity method investor to account for its initial investment at cost and shall
not separately test an investee’s underlying indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. It also requires an equity method investor to
account for share issuance by an investee as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment. The resulting gain or loss shall be
recognized in earnings. The Company is evaluating whether the adoption of EITF Issue No. 08-6 will have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets,” amending FASB
Statement No. 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires an employer to disclose investment policies and strategies, categories, fair value measurements,
and significant concentration of risk among its postretirement benefit plan assets. The adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is not expected to have a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company operates internationally, giving rise to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. From time to time,
the Company borrows in various currencies to reduce the level of net assets subject to changes in foreign exchange rates or purchases foreign
exchange forward and option contracts to hedge firm commitments, such as receivables and payables, denominated in foreign currencies.
The Company does not use the contracts for speculative or trading purposes. At November 30, 2008, the Company had three foreign
currency forward contracts expiring at various dates through January, 2009, with an aggregate fair value of $.1 million. Such instruments
are carried at fair value,with related adjustments recorded in other income.
Debt Risk
The Company has variable-rate, short-term and long-term debt as well as fixed-rate, long-term debt. The fair value of the Company's fixedrate
debt is subject to changes in interest rates.The estimated fair value of the Company's variable-rate debt approximates the carrying value
of such debt since the variable interest rates are market-based and the Company believes such debt could be refinanced on materially similar
terms. The Company is subject to the availability of credit to support new requirements and to refinance long-term and short-term debt.
At November 30, 2008, the estimated fair value of notes payable by the Company totaling $10.0 million,with a fixed rate of 5.36% per annum,
was $9.9 million. The Company is required to repay these notes in annual installments of $10.0 million in 2009. At November 30, 2008, the
estimated fair value of notes payable by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary in Singapore totaling approximately $27.1 million, with a
fixed rate of 4.25% per annum, was $25.7 million. These notes must be repaid in installments of approximately $6.8 million per year
beginning in 2008. The Company had $7.2 million of variable-rate industrial development bonds payable at a rate of 1.32% per annum at
November 30, 2008, payable in 2016. The Company also had $8.5 million of variable-rate industrial development bonds payable at a rate of
1.32% per annum at November 30, 2008, payable in 2021. The industrial revenue bonds are supported by the Revolver.
| |
Expected Maturity Date |
Total Outstanding
As of November 30, 2008 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Thereafter |
Recorded Value |
Fair Value |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Debt: |
| Fixed-rate secured notes, payable in US$ |
$ 10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 10,000 |
$ 9,869 |
| Average interest rate |
5.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
5.36% |
|
|
| Fixed-rate secured notes,
payable in Singapore Dollars |
6,763 |
6,763 |
6,763 |
6,763 |
|
|
27,052 |
25,676 |
| Average interest rate |
4.25% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
|
|
4.25% |
|
|
Variable-rate industrial development bonds,
payable in US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
7,200 |
7,200 |
7,200 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
1.32% |
1.32% |
|
|
Variable-rate industrial development bonds,
payable in US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
8,500 |
8,500 |
| Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
1.32% |
1.32% |
|
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
All statements and assumptions contained in this Annual Report that do not directly and exclusively relate to historical facts constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements represent current expectations and beliefs of the Company, and no assurance can be given that the results described in
such statements will be achieved.
Forward-looking information contained in these statements include, among other things, statements with respect to the Company’s
financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive positions, growth
opportunities, plans and objectives of management, and other matters. Such statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks,
uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially
from the results described in such statements. These factors include without limitation those listed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended November 30, 2008. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report speak
only as of the date of this Annual Report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or release any revisions to any
forward-looking statement or to report any events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except as required by law. |